gynekologen

gynekologen — CS2 Stats

BL76561198116088055[U:1:155822327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,069Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,914 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,914 → 2,914
+53Tracked matches · now 4,069
+6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,617 -34 20 Feb – 21 Feb · 2 days played
27,61727,651peak 27,65120 Feb21 Feb
Faceit ELO: 2,914 +0 2 Sept – 18 Oct · 6 observations
2,9142,914peak 2,9142 Sept18 Oct
27,888Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,914Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,914
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 86 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgynekologenFACEITLevel 10 · 2,914 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,914csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning63
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–44Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time478ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 478ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 26 Oct →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 1 Jun →
328msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 78% over 23anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4019–2148%0.01
dust2S2318–578%0.03
nukeA106–460%0.04
ancientC73–443%0.00
cacheS75–271%0.02
anubisC52–340%0.00
inferno—41–325%0.02
overpass—42–250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,563Matches
56%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
79.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
38Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage80554%1.2016.6
Dust233354%1.1816.8
Ancient32653%1.0615.1
Anubis25854%1.0414.8
Nuke25449%1.1115.5
Vertigo9154%1.1316.1
Inferno8948%1.1916.7
Overpass6658%1.0814.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
476msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
6.83HE damage / grenade
8.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.1834%26 Oct →
mirage13–30.0426%26 Oct →
dust213–70.0221%19 Oct →
ancient6–130.0119%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0421%16 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0413%15 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0121%12 Oct →
dust213–40.0812%12 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0318%12 Oct →
cache13–50.0520%5 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0418%5 Oct →
mirage13–30.0525%5 Oct →
mirage13–70.0418%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0022%3 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0218%3 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0419%3 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.1036%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0228%2 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0434%2 Oct →
cache4–130.0115%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0218%10 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0717%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0618%10 Sept →
ancient9–130.0120%10 Sept →
mirage7–130.0019%10 Sept →
cache13–80.1126%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0517%9 Sept →
anubis13–20.0444%8 Sept →
cache13–90.0230%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0329%7 Sept →
ancient5–130.0117%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0236%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0111%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0216%4 Sept →
nuke13–40.0821%2 Sept →
anubis16–130.0528%23 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0425%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0324%21 Aug →
dust213–110.0519%21 Aug →
nuke8–130.0114%21 Aug →
dust213–110.0435%15 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0118%6 Aug →
mirage7–130.0513%23 Jul →
nuke13–30.0426%11 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0123%11 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0126%20 Jun →
mirage7–130.0115%9 Jun →
inferno12–16-0.0112%8 Jun →
mirage13–90.0847%1 Jun →
nuke13–160.0019%28 May →
mirage13–11-0.0211%25 May →
overpass13–90.0613%23 May →
dust213–7-0.0319%23 May →
mirage13–11-0.0512%14 May →
inferno13–70.0819%14 May →
overpass13–100.0225%12 May →
dust213–80.0721%12 May →
mirage8–13-0.0412%12 May →
dust213–70.0111%12 May →
mirage13–80.0222%12 May →
dust27–13-0.0023%11 May →
ancient11–130.0124%18 Apr →
dust214–160.0512%18 Apr →
nuke13–80.0214%18 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0017%18 Apr →
dust213–80.0531%18 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0415%3 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0818%15 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0717%13 Mar →
mirage16–130.0630%8 Mar →
inferno12–16-0.0212%3 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0624%27 Feb →
dust213–90.0123%26 Feb →
nuke9–130.0434%21 Feb →
mirage13–110.0924%21 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0035%21 Feb →
mirage13–110.0724%21 Feb →
ancient13–50.0418%21 Feb →
dust213–70.0522%20 Feb →
mirage10–130.0121%20 Feb →
mirage13–40.1020%20 Feb →
dust213–10.0120%20 Feb →
mirage7–130.0124%20 Feb →
mirage13–50.0517%20 Feb →
dust213–80.0131%20 Feb →
nuke13–90.0035%20 Feb →
dust26–130.0119%20 Feb →
nuke13–90.1116%10 Feb →
overpass9–130.0126%10 Feb →
dust24–130.0124%10 Feb →
anubis17–190.0010%9 Feb →
mirage13–50.0124%9 Feb →
inferno9–130.0131%6 Feb →
mirage13–100.1027%6 Feb →
nuke13–20.0726%6 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0321%6 Feb →
mirage10–130.0227%2 Feb →
dust213–60.0420%2 Feb →
nuke13–160.0010%1 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0426%1 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.