damianski7

damianski7 — CS2 Stats

76561198115407874[U:1:155142146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

328Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,331Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating10,399Blue band · top ~52.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 958 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 5 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,399 +2,519 5 Jan17 Sept · 17 days played
7,65812,385peak 12,3855 Jan17 Sept
12,706Peak Premier in tracked matches
958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-01-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 958
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,986 below peak (12,385)
  • +2,673 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,601 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches21
Win rate38%
K/D0.66
Headshot %44%

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.4%42.7%43.8%6.4% short
Shot accuracy1.2%11.2%12.0%10.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.861.001.020.16 short
Match win rate41.3%43.9%44.7%3.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdamianski7FACEITLevel 4 · 958 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,399 · Blue bandPEAK ELO958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning42
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time580ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+5.4%
first ⅓ avg 10.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 19 Feb
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 29 Aug
367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 20 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 53% over 17cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23121152%-0.03
ancientB179853%-0.02
anubisC135838%-0.04
infernoB126650%-0.02
dust2B115645%-0.01
mirageC94544%0.01
cacheD62433%-0.02
overpass31233%-0.03
train32167%0.00
vertigo2020%-0.02
poseidon110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

10,271Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
670Matches
41.3%Match win rate
37.4%Headshot %
1.2%Shot accuracy
1,061MVPs
247Hours (in match)
655Bombs planted
118Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,102nuke
842inferno
728dust2
286vertigo
174office
127train
12ar_shoots
7italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
47%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
65.9ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1258%0.8413.2
Dust21145%0.6811.0
Ancient1050%0.8612.2
Mirage922%0.6811.9
Nuke771%1.0314.9
Inferno450%0.556.0
Train250%1.029.5
Cache10%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
70.3%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
586msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.68HE damage / grenade
11.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.477 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2121% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0817%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0113%17 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0111%17 Sept
inferno13–8-0.088%16 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0320%16 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0918%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0517%15 Sept
cache4–13-0.106%15 Sept
nuke13–70.0120%14 Sept
nuke13–80.0226%14 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0514%14 Sept
nuke8–13-0.1114%14 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0511%14 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0111%13 Sept
nuke13–80.0021%13 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0620%13 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0533%13 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0618%13 Sept
dust216–14-0.0025%10 Sept
inferno7–13-0.1017%9 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0611%9 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0723%8 Sept
nuke13–9-0.038%8 Sept
nuke11–10-0.0333%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0117%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0613%7 Sept
dust23–13-0.0519%7 Sept
ancient6–13-0.093%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.039%7 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0426%2 Sept
cache13–4-0.059%2 Sept
inferno5–130.0316%2 Sept
dust215–15-0.0212%31 Aug
anubis13–60.0120%31 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0019%31 Aug
cache2–13-0.0717%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.017%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.0310%30 Aug
mirage13–50.1017%30 Aug
ancient13–60.097%30 Aug
inferno5–130.0325%30 Aug
ancient13–10-0.042%30 Aug
cache16–130.0310%30 Aug
mirage1–13-0.089%30 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0411%29 Aug
nuke13–2-0.016%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0318%29 Aug
dust213–30.009%29 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0235%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0416%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.109%29 Aug
ancient13–90.0212%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0017%28 Aug
anubis10–130.078%28 Aug
dust213–70.079%28 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1011%27 Aug
inferno13–60.0415%27 Aug
cache11–130.049%27 Aug
vertigo10–130.0011%29 Jul
vertigo3–13-0.0318%29 Jul
inferno13–70.079%11 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0224%10 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0524%10 Jun
anubis13–70.055%8 Jun
ancient13–100.0015%6 Jun
inferno8–130.0114%3 Jun
cache12–120.0124%3 Jun
nuke9–7-0.063%26 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0212%26 Feb
mirage13–10.0017%20 Feb
dust211–13-0.0612%19 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0316%19 Feb
poseidon9–10.1714%19 Feb
inferno9–5-0.109%19 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0215%18 Feb
anubis13–9-0.078%15 Feb
dust213–30.036%15 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0318%11 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0110%10 Feb
nuke13–70.1015%3 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0017%2 Feb
ancient10–13-0.014%1 Feb
anubis1–13-0.100%1 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0817%1 Feb
anubis2–13-0.026%1 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0315%1 Feb
mirage12–160.0813%27 Jan
nuke13–100.0111%27 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0513%27 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0411%27 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0212%11 Jan
nuke5–13-0.085%11 Jan
nuke11–13-0.1026%11 Jan
ancient1–13-0.036%11 Jan
dust213–2-0.0117%11 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0311%10 Jan
mirage2–13-0.070%10 Jan
train13–8-0.029%8 Jan
train13–100.054%6 Jan
train5–13-0.017%5 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →