Räkäbeee

Räkäbeee — CS2 Stats

FI76561198115305372[U:1:155039644]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,713Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,106Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73975 of 232081 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+106Premier CS Rating · 20,000 → 20,106
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 29 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,106 +2,269 29 Apr20 Sept · 28 days played
17,62421,565peak 21,56529 Apr20 Sept
22,136Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,682Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-04-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,682
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 69 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,459 below peak (21,565)
  • -342 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,004 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,894 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRäkäbeeePREMIER20,106 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,682csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning49
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics2.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time578ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 4–13 · dust2, 7 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · poseidon, 17 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 20 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 16 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16dust2Weakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2191243%-0.01
cacheC1881044%-0.00
nukeS1613381%0.01
dust2D1531220%0.01
infernoB147750%0.02
ancientD124833%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.02
office1010%0.00
anubis110100%-0.07
overpass110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

965Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13350%0.9315.2
Ancient10552%1.0615.8
Nuke9561%1.0815.4
Inferno9261%1.0815.6
Dust27549%1.0115.8
Anubis2133%0.8713.7
Overpass1753%1.1315.7
Train1145%0.9616.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
62.8%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
591msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
11.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.298% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.1519%20 Sept
dust211–13-0.0025%20 Sept
nuke13–60.0313%20 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0115%19 Sept
ancient2–130.0012%19 Sept
dust21–13-0.0621%19 Sept
nuke13–20.099%19 Sept
cache13–70.029%19 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0712%19 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0217%17 Sept
poseidon6–9-0.0243%17 Sept
nuke13–90.0110%16 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0212%16 Sept
cache11–13-0.0218%13 Sept
dust25–130.0118%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0611%13 Sept
nuke9–6-0.1026%13 Sept
inferno9–60.1019%13 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0214%9 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0624%9 Sept
cache13–110.0519%9 Sept
cache16–130.0010%30 Aug
nuke11–13-0.057%30 Aug
cache15–15-0.0614%28 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0121%28 Aug
inferno13–10.0515%28 Aug
inferno9–40.2113%23 Aug
ancient13–100.0415%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0212%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0217%20 Aug
cache13–16-0.0212%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0322%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0221%8 Aug
ancient5–130.0117%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0723%8 Aug
nuke13–90.0419%8 Aug
inferno13–20.0311%8 Aug
cache13–7-0.019%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0610%7 Aug
nuke13–60.009%6 Aug
inferno7–90.0522%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0726%31 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0117%31 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0316%31 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0410%30 Jul
nuke13–70.0216%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0416%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0114%26 Jul
cache13–40.0923%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0523%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.028%18 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0014%18 Jul
ancient13–20.1024%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0720%4 Jul
cache13–7-0.0127%4 Jul
ancient10–130.0114%3 Jul
ancient7–13-0.086%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0515%28 Jun
cache11–13-0.0017%28 Jun
dust213–40.0717%27 Jun
nuke9–13-0.028%27 Jun
inferno15–150.008%26 Jun
mirage10–13-0.008%26 Jun
ancient8–130.0419%22 Jun
dust24–13-0.0317%22 Jun
nuke16–130.0414%22 Jun
office8–130.0021%17 Jun
inferno13–110.0122%17 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0513%17 Jun
dust24–13-0.0126%13 Jun
mirage16–140.0117%13 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0110%13 Jun
cache12–12-0.0118%13 Jun
anubis5–1-0.070%13 Jun
cache12–120.0115%12 Jun
mirage12–120.0711%12 Jun
inferno10–130.0611%6 Jun
dust27–130.0519%6 Jun
mirage16–140.0714%5 Jun
ancient11–130.0218%31 May
nuke13–100.0525%31 May
mirage5–130.0423%31 May
mirage9–13-0.0221%25 May
nuke13–00.067%16 May
mirage13–100.0011%16 May
dust213–110.0114%13 May
dust213–30.0716%13 May
mirage7–13-0.049%11 May
inferno5–13-0.0516%11 May
ancient13–80.0215%10 May
cache13–8-0.0614%8 May
dust24–130.2114%7 May
cache0–3-0.080%7 May
cache13–90.0713%7 May
nuke13–9-0.0311%3 May
mirage4–13-0.134%3 May
overpass13–70.1212%3 May
cache7–13-0.0112%1 May
nuke9–130.045%29 Apr
cache4–13-0.0017%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →