QUANTUM MARRIAGE COUNSELLOR

QUANTUM MARRIAGE COUNSELLOR — CS2 Stats

QA76561198113890197[U:1:153624469]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,679Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21557 of 251214 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,313 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 24,999
0Faceit ELO · 2,313 → 2,313
+189Tracked matches · now 3,679
+13.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 70.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +0 2 Sept – 7 Sept · 2 observations
24,99924,999peak 24,9992 Sept7 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,313 +0 2 Sept – 7 Sept · 2 observations
2,3132,313peak 2,3132 Sept7 Sept
24,999Peak Premier on CSDB
2,313Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,313
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 187 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,999
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQUANTUM MARRIAGE COUNSELL…FACEITLevel 10 · 2,313 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,313csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–43Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time532ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 5 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · cache, 12 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 19 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 18nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2817–1161%0.00
ancientS1814–478%0.02
dust2B158–753%0.02
anubisB147–750%0.00
cacheC135–838%0.01
nukeD72–529%0.01
inferno—44–0100%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,071Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage71249%1.0916.3
Ancient50454%1.1817.1
Dust249949%1.0916.1
Anubis44354%1.1617.3
Inferno27351%1.1216.5
Nuke18150%1.1116.9
Vertigo6748%1.1217.1
Train6742%1.1818.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
535msReaction time
44.2%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
9.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4872 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage19–16-0.0217%9 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0518%9 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0212%9 Oct →
cache13–30.0613%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0419%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0120%7 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0118%7 Oct →
mirage13–50.0414%5 Oct →
dust216–130.0114%2 Oct →
ancient13–60.0223%2 Oct →
mirage9–130.0421%30 Sept →
ancient13–80.0118%29 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0220%28 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0118%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0221%27 Sept →
anubis13–60.0528%23 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0122%22 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0116%22 Sept →
ancient13–90.0022%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.015%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.0227%22 Sept →
ancient13–90.0116%21 Sept →
dust213–60.1027%21 Sept →
nuke19–160.0123%20 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.059%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0120%20 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0216%16 Sept →
nuke6–130.0127%16 Sept →
dust214–160.0230%16 Sept →
mirage13–70.0823%14 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0312%14 Sept →
cache19–170.0317%13 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0016%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0314%12 Sept →
mirage13–00.0817%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0215%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0115%10 Sept →
nuke10–130.0218%9 Sept →
ancient13–100.0421%9 Sept →
ancient13–10.1030%9 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0938%9 Sept →
ancient13–40.0213%9 Sept →
anubis17–19-0.0115%8 Sept →
cache9–130.0222%8 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.049%7 Sept →
mirage19–160.0012%6 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0612%6 Sept →
dust213–40.1334%5 Sept →
anubis11–130.0121%3 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0932%3 Sept →
ancient13–100.0519%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0122%2 Sept →
mirage13–80.0723%2 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.037%1 Sept →
anubis13–160.0130%1 Sept →
anubis13–50.0618%31 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0423%31 Aug →
dust213–30.0923%31 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0616%31 Aug →
ancient16–120.0717%31 Aug →
inferno16–120.0134%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0016%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0121%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0118%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0329%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0415%29 Aug →
dust213–70.0531%29 Aug →
nuke7–130.0021%26 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0523%24 Aug →
nuke16–190.0421%24 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0211%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0213%24 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0523%24 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.1014%23 Aug →
mirage13–50.0525%23 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0229%23 Aug →
dust211–130.0029%21 Aug →
dust26–130.0323%19 Aug →
mirage13–70.0518%19 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0027%19 Aug →
cache13–80.0726%19 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0710%19 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0219%19 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.008%19 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0328%18 Aug →
mirage13–110.0115%18 Aug →
cache6–130.0224%17 Aug →
cache13–50.0433%12 Aug →
inferno16–120.0616%12 Aug →
anubis13–60.0724%12 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0418%12 Aug →
ancient11–130.0311%12 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0043%12 Aug →
mirage13–30.0418%12 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0025%12 Aug →
dust213–100.0430%11 Aug →
cache7–130.0625%11 Aug →
mirage13–60.0834%11 Aug →
ancient11–130.0516%11 Aug →
mirage10–130.0227%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.