jxnuary

jxnuary — CS2 Stats

NL76561198112172635[U:1:151906907]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,466Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,265 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,265 → 2,265
+28Tracked matches · now 2,466
−13.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 85 days played since 26 Jan 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,265 +0 2 Sept5 Sept · 2 observations
2,2652,265peak 2,2652 Sept5 Sept
2,265Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
85Days played since 2025-01-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,265
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 235 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjxnuaryFACEITLevel 10 · 2,265 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,265csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning60
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.0
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time564ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 11 Mar
42%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · anubis, 7 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 7 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
1012In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%-0.00
ancientB189950%0.02
dust2C1661038%0.02
anubisA95456%0.00
overpassS75271%0.00
nukeD62433%0.02
trainS64267%0.02
office32167%0.02
inferno31233%0.07
cache21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,108Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
82.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage54651%1.1816.7
Anubis32556%1.2517.4
Ancient29150%1.1916.9
Dust224747%1.1216.4
Inferno11046%1.2315.8
Overpass6461%1.2616.4
Nuke4420%1.0115.4
Vertigo4448%1.1017.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
551msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
5.21HE damage / grenade
6.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2825 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8362% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0220%12 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0017%7 Sept
mirage6–130.0323%7 Sept
dust29–13-0.0130%6 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0520%5 Sept
ancient13–40.0321%31 Aug
mirage13–20.0924%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0318%28 Aug
cache13–100.0523%25 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0318%11 Aug
anubis13–50.0418%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0215%10 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0212%4 Aug
dust27–130.0019%30 Jul
mirage13–50.0228%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0213%15 Jul
mirage13–50.056%15 Jul
overpass13–100.0022%29 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0212%28 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0320%18 May
ancient13–9-0.0330%11 May
anubis13–70.0013%9 May
cache7–13-0.0313%29 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0415%25 Apr
dust213–110.0117%20 Apr
anubis11–13-0.021%20 Apr
ancient19–170.0012%12 Apr
anubis2–13-0.1042%7 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0317%5 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0220%23 Mar
office13–11-0.0512%21 Mar
dust213–70.1124%13 Mar
mirage13–90.0522%13 Mar
ancient13–00.1413%11 Mar
dust27–130.0615%4 Mar
mirage9–130.0018%3 Mar
inferno9–70.1210%3 Mar
dust213–60.1029%14 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0222%9 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0129%24 Jan
office12–120.0311%22 Jan
office6–00.0711%22 Jan
ancient5–130.0415%13 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0212%10 Jan
ancient13–40.0312%10 Jan
mirage5–130.0218%29 Dec
dust25–1-0.0633%21 Dec
overpass13–100.0316%18 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0614%12 Dec
train5–13-0.0535%6 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0614%4 Dec
nuke13–40.1241%28 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0617%17 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0322%15 Nov
train16–19-0.0216%29 Oct
train13–30.0624%26 Oct
ancient13–60.0331%25 Oct
nuke10–130.0127%25 Oct
train19–160.0218%13 Oct
dust216–14-0.0220%11 Oct
dust25–13-0.0217%10 Oct
dust29–13-0.0218%8 Oct
overpass13–2-0.0018%1 Oct
ancient6–130.0313%30 Sept
dust24–130.0613%27 Sept
dust211–13-0.0218%24 Sept
mirage2–13-0.047%17 Sept
overpass11–13-0.037%15 Sept
nuke13–50.0423%9 Sept
dust217–190.0426%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0111%5 Sept
train13–100.0618%5 Sept
overpass13–80.0011%27 Aug
mirage13–70.0521%25 Aug
nuke5–130.0116%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0722%23 Aug
train13–90.0321%20 Aug
mirage10–130.0112%13 Aug
mirage13–80.0214%13 Aug
mirage8–130.0417%1 Aug
overpass3–130.0020%31 Jul
dust213–50.0810%28 Jul
dust211–130.0317%25 Jul
overpass11–30.0320%18 Jul
mirage14–160.0016%18 Jul
anubis9–130.028%21 Jun
inferno11–130.1113%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0012%25 May
inferno15–19-0.0124%24 May
ancient13–30.0214%23 May
mirage13–110.0422%17 May
ancient13–110.0621%13 May
anubis13–70.0717%23 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0629%29 Mar
mirage14–160.0423%22 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0021%22 Feb
ancient16–190.0014%22 Feb
mirage8–12-0.0213%30 Jan
anubis13–90.0313%28 Jan
anubis13–50.008%26 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →