Cake

Cake — CS2 Stats

76561198107787604[U:1:147521876]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

831Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#52511 of 222426 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 67 days played since 23 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,730 +13,505 14 Dec4 Jun · 7 days played
8,22521,730peak 21,73014 Dec4 Jun
21,730Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,537Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
67Days played since 2025-11-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,537
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCakePEAK ELO1,537csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning55
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility2.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.5
Utility2.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time581ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 25 Mar
49%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 4 Jan
414msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 20 Dec
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 17 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 37infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS37241365%0.01
dust2B30161453%0.01
infernoD124833%0.03
ancientA95456%0.01
overpass43175%0.02
nuke32167%0.08
train2020%0.02
cache110100%-0.03
anubis110100%0.03
office1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,131Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
76.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17252%1.1316.3
Dust211861%1.1415.6
Inferno6337%1.0716.1
Ancient3234%0.8614.3
Overpass2162%1.1714.8
Nuke1540%0.9313.5
Train1457%1.1615.2
Vertigo812%0.9815.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
576msReaction time
17.7%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
4.83HE damage / grenade
9.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4946 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.7391% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.029%15 Sept
mirage9–3-0.0214%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0520%15 Sept
dust28–13-0.107%12 Sept
mirage13–50.0313%12 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0137%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0614%12 Aug
cache13–7-0.0315%27 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0414%4 Jun
dust211–130.0225%1 May
mirage16–14-0.0314%23 Apr
dust213–4-0.0217%20 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0012%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0517%18 Apr
dust213–80.0411%18 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0114%18 Apr
mirage13–80.0522%18 Apr
overpass13–10.0027%17 Apr
dust213–4-0.0217%17 Apr
dust213–100.0217%11 Apr
dust213–5-0.0216%6 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0211%6 Apr
dust22–9-0.1020%5 Apr
dust213–20.0433%5 Apr
mirage5–00.1520%30 Mar
dust24–130.0025%29 Mar
anubis13–30.0324%25 Mar
nuke9–00.2424%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0523%25 Mar
mirage13–100.1229%23 Mar
mirage13–60.0026%22 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0514%21 Mar
dust213–60.0117%21 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0115%19 Mar
inferno13–90.0712%15 Mar
mirage13–80.0433%14 Mar
mirage13–11-0.017%13 Mar
dust213–80.0519%12 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0318%9 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0126%9 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0222%9 Mar
dust212–160.0023%8 Mar
dust213–90.0131%6 Mar
ancient11–130.0524%5 Mar
mirage16–190.0119%4 Mar
mirage8–130.0119%4 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0113%3 Mar
mirage13–110.0223%2 Mar
ancient13–100.1420%26 Feb
mirage13–50.1033%26 Feb
office10–130.1023%23 Feb
train9–130.0423%22 Feb
inferno4–130.0130%22 Feb
inferno12–120.0226%21 Feb
ancient13–70.1521%21 Feb
inferno13–110.0414%18 Feb
nuke13–50.0530%17 Feb
overpass13–70.0813%15 Feb
dust213–90.1728%15 Feb
dust213–90.0823%15 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0615%15 Feb
dust213–110.0314%12 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0218%10 Feb
dust211–13-0.0040%9 Feb
mirage13–70.0029%6 Feb
mirage15–150.1221%1 Feb
mirage8–130.0632%27 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0521%18 Jan
dust213–10.0419%18 Jan
mirage13–160.0126%13 Jan
dust28–13-0.0114%12 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0136%9 Jan
mirage13–40.1023%9 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0117%9 Jan
inferno13–50.0419%8 Jan
dust213–100.0928%6 Jan
mirage5–130.0216%4 Jan
dust214–16-0.0323%4 Jan
dust213–30.0849%4 Jan
inferno6–130.0223%3 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0223%3 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0410%25 Dec
ancient6–13-0.099%24 Dec
inferno13–30.0720%20 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0324%17 Dec
dust210–13-0.0626%17 Dec
dust211–13-0.0015%15 Dec
inferno8–130.0722%14 Dec
train14–16-0.0014%13 Dec
dust25–130.1025%13 Dec
inferno10–130.0231%10 Dec
mirage13–80.0426%7 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0220%6 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0116%5 Dec
dust213–100.0117%5 Dec
overpass16–130.0218%4 Dec
dust27–13-0.0234%4 Dec
dust215–19-0.0611%30 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0022%23 Nov
mirage13–110.0429%23 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →