xxd

xxd — CS2 Stats

FI76561198104138969[U:1:143873241]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

737Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 21 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,338 +2,815 8 Apr6 Jul · 18 days played
14,52318,375peak 18,3758 Apr6 Jul
19,108Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-03-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxxdFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time630ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 713ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 21 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · vertigo, 9 May
484msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 29 Jun
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%-0.00
infernoA2113862%-0.00
anubisA117464%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.04
dust2D92722%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.00
overpassB63350%-0.03
cache41325%-0.01
vertigo42250%-0.00
poseidon21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

260Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4955%1.0613.8
Mirage4838%0.8913.1
Vertigo3861%0.9615.6
Dust23345%0.9315.4
Nuke2378%1.0317.4
Inferno2050%0.8712.6
Ancient1644%0.9513.6
Overpass1164%0.9512.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
640msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.88HE damage / grenade
9.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6091% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0214%24 Jul
cache14–16-0.0615%24 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0317%24 Jul
anubis13–100.0213%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0514%24 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0211%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0116%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0627%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0116%11 Jul
cache2–13-0.0324%11 Jul
cache13–60.0415%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0821%9 Jul
anubis13–110.034%6 Jul
mirage5–130.0024%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0127%28 Jun
inferno3–130.0119%28 Jun
ancient5–130.0116%28 Jun
dust29–130.0223%28 Jun
cache10–130.0012%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.057%25 Jun
mirage5–130.0010%25 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0120%25 Jun
dust213–8-0.0220%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0212%25 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0121%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0719%25 Jun
mirage13–80.063%25 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0713%24 Jun
inferno10–00.0511%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0423%23 Jun
inferno11–130.0129%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0320%22 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0211%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0714%22 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0120%22 Jun
mirage13–20.1123%22 Jun
vertigo13–100.0115%18 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0621%18 Jun
overpass13–70.0222%18 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0613%18 Jun
dust216–130.0118%18 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0222%18 Jun
ancient12–20.0829%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0216%18 Jun
anubis15–150.0023%16 Jun
inferno13–6-0.077%16 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0524%16 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0421%16 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0221%16 Jun
mirage14–160.0026%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0418%16 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0516%16 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0326%10 Jun
anubis13–90.0125%10 Jun
inferno13–80.1225%9 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0322%9 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0119%4 Jun
anubis13–30.0830%4 Jun
inferno13–6-0.048%29 May
mirage13–8-0.0019%29 May
mirage16–13-0.008%9 May
anubis13–30.0116%9 May
overpass15–15-0.0214%9 May
nuke13–9-0.0122%9 May
inferno9–13-0.0421%9 May
inferno6–9-0.0112%9 May
vertigo8–8-0.0241%9 May
anubis10–130.0017%14 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0614%10 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0321%10 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0219%10 Apr
vertigo10–13-0.0821%9 Apr
overpass1–13-0.0821%9 Apr
mirage13–90.0316%9 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0711%8 Apr
inferno13–30.0923%7 Apr
nuke16–12-0.0411%6 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0217%6 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0825%6 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0638%6 Apr
inferno10–130.0111%2 Apr
mirage13–80.0410%2 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0815%2 Apr
mirage9–13-0.058%2 Apr
dust27–13-0.0019%2 Apr
mirage13–50.0618%2 Apr
anubis13–40.0124%31 Mar
vertigo9–60.0921%30 Mar
poseidon0–9-0.1914%30 Mar
inferno13–90.0311%29 Mar
overpass13–4-0.0314%29 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0529%22 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0626%22 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0515%22 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0516%22 Mar
dust27–13-0.0219%22 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0224%21 Mar
nuke1–9-0.1320%21 Mar
inferno9–10.1432%21 Mar
poseidon9–30.1620%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →