Samppa

Samppa — CS2 Stats

FI76561198046700676[U:1:86434948]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,473Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating22,616Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43153 of 226673 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,473 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 18 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,616 -4,845 18 Jun3 Sept · 15 days played
18,89827,461peak 27,46118 Jun3 Sept
27,461Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-06-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,845 below peak (27,461)
  • +2,256 over 30 days · improving
  • -4,845 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,384 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSamppaFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,616 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning66
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60382Last 10060%Win rateLWWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.9
Utility6.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.6
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time503ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–6 · vertigo, 2 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 26 Aug
352msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%0.02
infernoS2014670%0.06
cacheA148657%0.04
anubisS139469%0.03
ancientA85363%0.03
nukeC83538%0.04
dust2D72529%0.03
vertigoS550100%0.06
poseidon110100%0.07
debris1010%-0.05
eldorado110100%0.24
overpass110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,191Matches
53%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
101.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2654%1.2820.0
Vertigo2361%1.4721.9
Inferno2264%2.0322.5
Anubis1850%1.6218.8
Overpass1656%1.8220.7
Ancient838%1.1917.0
Nuke875%1.7027.5
Dust2450%1.0017.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
500msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
57.0%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4264% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0421%29 Aug
cache13–90.0022%29 Aug
inferno13–20.109%29 Aug
mirage13–8-0.058%29 Aug
dust213–100.0420%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0219%29 Aug
mirage3–130.0138%29 Aug
ancient13–110.0313%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.098%28 Aug
cache13–110.0313%28 Aug
inferno13–60.0413%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0216%28 Aug
dust27–130.0417%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0635%28 Aug
nuke6–130.0724%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0320%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0811%28 Aug
cache13–90.1222%28 Aug
ancient9–13-0.053%28 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1028%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0029%27 Aug
inferno7–130.0523%27 Aug
inferno13–20.1737%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0124%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0313%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0150%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0623%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0830%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0226%25 Aug
ancient13–50.0921%25 Aug
inferno5–130.0314%25 Aug
mirage13–90.0422%25 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0111%24 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0136%24 Aug
anubis0–13-0.010%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0915%24 Aug
cache8–130.1032%24 Aug
dust213–70.1223%24 Aug
inferno13–70.1127%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0417%24 Aug
mirage0–5-0.0425%23 Aug
mirage13–00.0650%23 Aug
anubis13–100.0619%23 Aug
inferno13–50.0519%23 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0119%23 Aug
dust212–16-0.0237%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0125%16 Aug
cache13–20.0614%16 Aug
inferno13–30.1217%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0415%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0221%2 Aug
nuke9–70.0717%2 Aug
vertigo9–60.2424%2 Aug
inferno9–30.2318%2 Aug
poseidon9–00.0714%2 Aug
debris8–8-0.0521%2 Aug
eldorado9–30.2421%2 Aug
ancient16–120.0425%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0723%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0425%1 Aug
anubis13–80.0123%1 Aug
cache13–20.0828%31 Jul
mirage15–150.1326%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0021%31 Jul
nuke10–130.1019%31 Jul
dust212–160.0728%31 Jul
vertigo13–50.0518%30 Jul
vertigo13–100.0122%30 Jul
nuke8–130.0318%24 Jul
anubis13–50.0417%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0624%24 Jul
cache14–160.0418%24 Jul
inferno13–20.1318%24 Jul
anubis13–100.0313%24 Jul
nuke12–160.0116%21 Jul
ancient13–20.0615%21 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0113%21 Jul
cache11–130.0226%21 Jul
inferno13–10.1033%21 Jul
cache13–40.1628%12 Jul
dust210–130.0118%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0216%12 Jul
inferno11–130.0614%12 Jul
mirage13–80.1019%12 Jul
cache13–90.1029%12 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%12 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0018%11 Jul
anubis5–130.0716%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0523%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0313%11 Jul
cache2–13-0.0821%11 Jul
cache13–60.0219%11 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.1028%4 Jul
anubis13–60.1025%2 Jul
ancient13–110.0323%2 Jul
inferno4–130.0113%2 Jul
vertigo13–100.1026%18 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0114%18 Jun
overpass13–70.0615%18 Jun
inferno13–110.0017%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →