thragg

thragg — CS2 Stats

76561198102158293[U:1:141892565]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,672Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#12900 of 16534 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,179 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

4,179Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 4,179
  • Reached: 4,000 ELO · 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO
  • 4,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGthraggFACEITLevel 10 · 4,179 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO4,179csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning44
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5248Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim9.0
Aggression4.1
Utility7.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time545ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8ancientWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A33191458%-0.02
mirageB1910953%0.01
ancientD1851328%-0.02
overpassA117464%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.02
anubisS87188%-0.00
inferno1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,143Matches
65%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
89.0ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37960%1.2818.6
Ancient19163%1.3417.1
Dust218364%1.3118.1
Anubis13362%1.3518.4
Train5463%1.2718.8
Nuke4961%1.2317.3
Overpass3754%1.2817.3
Vertigo2348%1.3117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
546msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
7.90HE damage / grenade
11.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5398% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0819%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0131%28 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0620%27 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0218%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0225%27 Aug
ancient5–130.0230%23 Aug
dust210–130.0124%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0025%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0031%25 Jun
dust213–6-0.0029%25 Jun
ancient7–130.0026%25 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1019%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0823%24 May
ancient9–130.0531%15 Apr
dust27–13-0.0238%15 Apr
ancient9–11-0.0428%14 Apr
ancient7–30.0433%14 Apr
dust213–7-0.0329%14 Apr
dust213–16-0.0631%13 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0628%13 Apr
dust28–13-0.0031%4 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0618%4 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0433%3 Apr
mirage19–170.0325%3 Apr
dust213–11-0.0435%3 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0321%3 Apr
mirage13–40.0329%3 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0336%1 Apr
dust213–110.0321%1 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0117%1 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0624%31 Mar
dust23–13-0.1016%26 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0417%26 Mar
dust213–9-0.0217%26 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0033%26 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0516%26 Mar
mirage13–50.0125%25 Mar
ancient13–50.0622%25 Mar
mirage13–80.0550%25 Mar
dust216–12-0.0644%25 Mar
mirage13–70.0718%17 Mar
dust26–13-0.0513%17 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0546%13 Mar
dust211–130.0032%13 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0429%13 Mar
nuke22–20-0.0615%13 Mar
dust213–9-0.0518%13 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0722%12 Mar
dust210–13-0.0522%12 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0213%12 Mar
dust213–8-0.0314%11 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0428%11 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0614%4 Mar
dust210–13-0.0723%4 Mar
dust213–6-0.0329%2 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0348%2 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0132%2 Mar
dust210–13-0.0431%27 Feb
overpass13–50.0431%27 Feb
anubis13–100.0318%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0419%27 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0426%27 Feb
dust25–130.0327%27 Feb
nuke13–40.1119%26 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0318%26 Feb
dust213–20.0320%26 Feb
nuke0–13-0.0531%22 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0216%22 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0020%22 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0332%22 Feb
dust213–10.0029%22 Feb
dust213–40.0017%21 Feb
mirage13–00.0211%21 Feb
nuke13–40.0212%19 Feb
overpass13–90.0433%19 Feb
overpass10–130.0444%14 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0031%14 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0115%14 Feb
dust213–9-0.0312%14 Feb
anubis13–80.0525%14 Feb
overpass13–40.0225%13 Feb
dust213–11-0.0429%13 Feb
ancient13–00.0319%12 Feb
overpass9–13-0.086%3 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0432%3 Feb
mirage10–130.0134%28 Jan
dust27–130.0427%28 Jan
anubis16–120.0226%28 Jan
mirage13–100.0131%28 Jan
overpass13–30.0124%28 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0729%28 Jan
mirage10–130.0125%28 Jan
anubis13–7-0.0418%28 Jan
dust213–90.0419%27 Jan
overpass13–2-0.0450%27 Jan
dust216–14-0.0121%27 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0019%27 Jan
dust213–90.0133%23 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0327%23 Jan
dust213–10.0745%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →