BucksCucky

BucksCucky — CS2 Stats

CN76561198100463141[U:1:140197413]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,039Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating29,617Top 1% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#770 of 238125 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,354 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 2 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,617 -67 2 Aug14 Sept · 14 days played
26,41930,118peak 30,1182 Aug14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,354 +0 5 Sept10 Sept · 2 observations
1,3541,354peak 1,3545 Sept10 Sept
30,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,354Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,354
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 177 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 501 below peak (30,118)
  • +3,032 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 383 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBucksCuckyFACEITLevel 10 · 1,354 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER29,617 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,354csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning41
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWWWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.09 avg rating · +16.0pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility2.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time513ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 17 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · mirage, 6 Sept
336msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · dust2, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A38241463%-0.01
mirageA22121055%0.02
infernoB147750%0.03
anubisB63350%0.04
ancientS64267%0.01
nuke41325%-0.07
cache31233%0.01
train330100%0.01
vertigo220100%0.11
office21150%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

619Matches
52%Win rate
1.58Avg K/D
103.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6755%1.5421.5
Dust24860%1.6322.1
Ancient2854%1.6420.9
Anubis2763%1.5721.1
Inferno1747%1.3920.4
Nuke862%2.2722.9
Overpass540%1.4621.8
Cache425%1.3022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.2%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
525msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
29.8%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
4.29HE damage / grenade
4.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3559 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3738% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–30.1321%18 Sept
inferno13–90.1935%18 Sept
anubis13–40.2022%17 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0711%17 Sept
nuke6–9-0.1750%17 Sept
anubis9–130.0316%17 Sept
ancient13–70.1019%14 Sept
anubis13–20.009%14 Sept
dust21–13-0.0557%14 Sept
ancient13–60.0721%14 Sept
dust22–13-0.0812%14 Sept
mirage0–13-0.070%13 Sept
ancient2–0-0.090%13 Sept
dust28–3-0.039%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0817%13 Sept
mirage13–60.0416%13 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0121%11 Sept
dust212–6-0.0712%9 Sept
inferno11–130.019%9 Sept
dust213–3-0.035%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0113%9 Sept
dust213–7-0.0117%9 Sept
dust213–1-0.0418%9 Sept
anubis13–00.1112%8 Sept
dust213–100.0816%8 Sept
cache13–30.1014%8 Sept
mirage13–50.0513%8 Sept
inferno13–10.0620%8 Sept
dust26–13-0.0813%8 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0321%8 Sept
mirage5–130.0120%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.0022%8 Sept
dust213–60.017%8 Sept
dust213–10-0.108%8 Sept
dust23–10.038%8 Sept
dust21–4-0.1633%6 Sept
mirage4–00.1160%6 Sept
dust213–40.0621%5 Sept
mirage9–130.0614%5 Sept
dust213–10.0414%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0416%5 Sept
mirage13–30.0213%5 Sept
dust213–60.0919%5 Sept
dust211–130.0120%5 Sept
dust26–13-0.0024%2 Sept
vertigo9–30.0827%2 Sept
inferno9–40.0421%2 Sept
office13–30.0917%2 Sept
office9–130.1916%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0020%28 Aug
cache11–130.009%27 Aug
dust213–70.0316%22 Aug
dust23–13-0.1325%22 Aug
dust210–130.0726%22 Aug
inferno13–40.0521%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0210%22 Aug
dust27–5-0.0117%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0015%21 Aug
inferno4–130.0213%21 Aug
dust213–3-0.0224%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0113%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.057%21 Aug
dust213–80.0127%21 Aug
dust213–30.0329%21 Aug
dust21–13-0.0850%21 Aug
dust21–13-0.1126%21 Aug
mirage6–4-0.044%21 Aug
anubis1–8-0.0536%21 Aug
dust213–4-0.0125%20 Aug
train13–110.0113%14 Aug
train13–10.0115%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0120%10 Aug
inferno14–160.0118%10 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0418%9 Aug
dust24–10.0529%9 Aug
inferno13–00.039%9 Aug
cache0–13-0.089%9 Aug
mirage13–00.1913%9 Aug
dust21–13-0.030%9 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0520%9 Aug
dust213–4-0.049%8 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0327%8 Aug
dust213–30.1727%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0416%8 Aug
inferno13–00.1121%8 Aug
dust25–0-0.020%8 Aug
dust212–00.1311%8 Aug
ancient10–10.0311%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0512%5 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1214%5 Aug
train8–3-0.0024%4 Aug
inferno13–10.0718%2 Aug
mirage13–30.034%2 Aug
dust20–130.000%2 Aug
mirage13–10.0418%2 Aug
mirage0–13-0.010%2 Aug
mirage13–30.0721%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.0610%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0436%2 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0417%2 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →