slippy

slippy — CS2 Stats

76561198096129830[U:1:135864102]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,595Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,881Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,095 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,881 +54 30 Sept – 10 Oct · 3 days played
14,82714,999peak 14,99930 Sept10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,095 +0 8 Sept – 12 Sept · 2 observations
1,0951,095peak 1,0958 Sept12 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,095Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,095
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 118 below peak (14,999)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 119 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGslippyFACEITLevel 6 · 1,095 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,881 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,095csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning68
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.4
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time518ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 21 Aug →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 30 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 2 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 19ancientWeakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC269–1735%0.00
dust2C228–1436%0.02
infernoC219–1243%0.01
mirageA1911–858%0.02
nuke—42–250%0.02
cache—32–167%0.15
office—21–150%0.09
anubis—11–0100%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.19
vertigo—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
44%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5847%1.2017.5
Inferno5749%1.1815.4
Mirage4154%1.0615.0
Dust23327%1.0415.6
Anubis1040%1.0814.6
Train838%0.9914.1
Overpass540%1.5420.0
Nuke40%0.7012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
42.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
515msReaction time
55.0%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
4.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.9432% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4928 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–130.1219%10 Oct →
ancient11–130.0113%2 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0115%2 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0110%30 Sept →
nuke5–130.0232%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0614%30 Sept →
mirage10–130.0412%30 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.083%16 Sept →
dust213–9-0.025%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.073%12 Sept →
ancient13–30.0423%11 Sept →
nuke13–50.0424%11 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.048%11 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0518%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.046%9 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0412%9 Sept →
ancient16–19-0.018%9 Sept →
cache13–70.1115%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.006%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.1313%5 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0129%4 Sept →
dust212–120.0912%4 Sept →
dust210–130.0019%4 Sept →
ancient9–130.0115%4 Sept →
mirage13–110.0411%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.037%2 Sept →
mirage16–140.0817%2 Sept →
nuke8–130.039%2 Sept →
office13–110.0217%1 Sept →
mirage16–130.0111%1 Sept →
mirage16–140.028%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0412%1 Sept →
dust213–80.1212%1 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0211%1 Sept →
dust29–130.038%1 Sept →
dust28–5-0.026%1 Sept →
inferno10–130.018%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.074%1 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.038%1 Sept →
dust216–19-0.037%1 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0423%1 Sept →
dust213–80.1115%31 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0712%31 Aug →
ancient9–130.009%30 Aug →
inferno10–130.0110%30 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.067%30 Aug →
ancient8–130.0012%29 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0112%28 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.019%28 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.065%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0125%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.1011%28 Aug →
inferno7–130.1519%27 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0610%27 Aug →
mirage13–10.0517%27 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.069%27 Aug →
ancient13–60.013%26 Aug →
mirage6–130.0115%25 Aug →
ancient13–70.0720%25 Aug →
dust213–110.1316%24 Aug →
inferno8–130.0215%24 Aug →
dust26–130.009%23 Aug →
office12–120.1523%23 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0313%23 Aug →
train13–10.1921%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0314%23 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0111%23 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0214%22 Aug →
mirage13–100.0210%22 Aug →
inferno13–70.0312%22 Aug →
nuke13–110.0022%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0311%21 Aug →
mirage12–120.1811%21 Aug →
cache13–40.2116%21 Aug →
inferno9–130.0316%20 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0314%20 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0610%20 Aug →
inferno12–120.0318%19 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0115%18 Aug →
dust213–50.0716%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0114%18 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.024%18 Aug →
ancient13–10.127%18 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0510%18 Aug →
ancient0–00.000%13 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.048%11 Aug →
ancient13–70.1312%9 Aug →
dust26–2-0.0627%9 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0519%7 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0126%7 Aug →
dust213–60.1017%7 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0315%6 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0130%4 Aug →
dust28–130.0415%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0218%23 Jul →
vertigo13–110.0912%22 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0313%21 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0615%18 Jul →
inferno13–100.0411%16 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0417%14 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.