Reece

Reece — CS2 Stats

76561198095405128[U:1:135139400]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,047Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,389Purple band · top ~14.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,389 -2,986 26 Apr – 22 Oct · 18 days played
18,05822,473peak 22,47326 Apr22 Oct
22,473Peak Premier in tracked matches
57Days played since 2026-04-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,084 below peak (22,473)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,611 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReeceFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,389 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning61
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −8.3pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 28.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 24 Jun →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · vertigo, 31 May →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · vertigo, 31 May →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 9 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2716–1159%0.04
anubisA1710–759%0.01
mirageC156–940%0.01
ancientC146–843%0.03
nukeA106–460%0.03
dust2S65–183%0.02
office—31–233%0.04
overpass—22–0100%-0.01
inferno—20–20%0.00
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.01
boulder—10–10%-0.02
shelter—11–0100%0.05
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

943Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7445%1.0215.2
Anubis5155%1.0215.6
Ancient4953%1.1316.7
Dust23751%1.0815.2
Vertigo1457%1.2315.1
Nuke1362%1.1017.5
Cache1173%1.2116.8
Overpass450%1.1418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
608msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
4.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0875% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.0412%22 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0822%13 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0632%6 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0419%5 Oct →
anubis13–40.0628%4 Oct →
dust213–30.0218%4 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0120%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0118%1 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0424%27 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0721%9 Sept →
cache13–70.0044%7 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0614%5 Sept →
ancient13–60.0727%31 Aug →
cache13–70.1036%31 Aug →
nuke16–140.1340%27 Aug →
cache13–100.0227%27 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0529%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0031%19 Aug →
ancient15–150.0928%18 Aug →
ancient13–00.1023%9 Aug →
cache10–130.1132%9 Aug →
cache11–130.0520%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0119%7 Aug →
mirage7–130.0520%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0124%3 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0336%3 Aug →
ancient3–130.0426%29 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0642%27 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0119%27 Jul →
cache16–140.0229%27 Jul →
cache13–100.0428%19 Jul →
fachwerk13–4-0.0137%17 Jul →
boulder5–13-0.0232%17 Jul →
shelter13–100.0528%17 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0612%12 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.0230%4 Jul →
ancient13–70.1842%24 Jun →
overpass16–13-0.0418%24 Jun →
anubis13–40.0441%18 Jun →
mirage13–90.0725%17 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0133%17 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0120%17 Jun →
office10–130.0235%9 Jun →
cache4–130.0342%9 Jun →
office7–130.0642%7 Jun →
ancient13–90.0135%7 Jun →
cache13–90.0128%7 Jun →
mirage13–70.0237%2 Jun →
anubis16–130.0837%2 Jun →
nuke8–130.0117%2 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0515%2 Jun →
nuke7–10.0838%2 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0435%1 Jun →
anubis13–110.0241%31 May →
ancient4–130.0427%31 May →
inferno10–13-0.0330%31 May →
anubis13–80.0731%31 May →
ancient8–13-0.0122%31 May →
vertigo9–2-0.0257%31 May →
cache13–80.0531%29 May →
nuke16–140.0840%29 May →
ancient13–80.1130%28 May →
mirage13–9-0.0029%28 May →
dust213–80.0430%25 May →
cache13–40.1243%24 May →
cache9–130.0541%24 May →
mirage9–130.0926%22 May →
cache13–40.0721%22 May →
cache8–130.0310%20 May →
anubis13–60.0823%20 May →
nuke13–70.1040%19 May →
anubis6–13-0.0218%18 May →
cache13–40.1130%17 May →
anubis13–90.0611%17 May →
inferno12–120.0433%16 May →
nuke2–13-0.0228%16 May →
dust216–14-0.0034%14 May →
mirage13–70.0444%11 May →
anubis13–80.0526%10 May →
cache8–13-0.0445%7 May →
dust213–40.0730%6 May →
ancient6–13-0.0330%4 May →
cache13–70.0933%4 May →
overpass16–130.0226%3 May →
anubis13–80.0221%3 May →
cache13–70.0524%2 May →
cache5–13-0.0223%2 May →
cache3–80.0323%2 May →
cache6–130.0122%2 May →
cache13–50.0744%1 May →
cache13–40.0638%30 Apr →
cache9–130.0238%30 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0018%28 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0138%28 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0129%27 Apr →
mirage16–120.0321%27 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0334%26 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0241%26 Apr →
office13–90.0327%25 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0419%24 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.