𝚃𝚑𝚖𝚜𝚗𝚡 — CS2 Stats

76561198095257826[U:1:134992098]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

982Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#227240 of 238041 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,364 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,364 → 1,364

+3Tracked matches · now 982

−3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.3%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 29 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,364 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 2 observations

1,364Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

18Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,364
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 167 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning48

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +72ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

11–9 · 55% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.5

Utility4.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch2.8

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 23% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning4.8

Utility4.1

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time570ms+8ms

first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 17 Sept →

38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 7 Sept →

406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 11 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 16vertigoWeakest map · 17% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	16	10–6	63%	0.00
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.02
vertigo	D	12	2–10	17%	-0.01
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
train	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	0.00
overpass	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.00
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.04
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,401Matches

51%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

71.2ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	62	50%	0.92	15.8
Anubis	56	41%	0.89	13.1
Mirage	47	51%	0.79	13.0
Nuke	45	60%	0.90	15.1
Inferno	38	34%	0.79	13.7
Overpass	36	53%	0.88	13.9
Dust2	31	45%	0.82	14.2
Cache	13	77%	0.94	12.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy

35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.6%Spray accuracy

83.4%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

563msReaction time

58.2%T opening success

22.8%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

6.55HE damage / grenade

4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 22.8086% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	5–13	-0.08	31%	21 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.04	23%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	15%	21 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	21%	21 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.05	12%	20 Sept →
overpass	13–8	0.07	24%	20 Sept →
train	13–11	-0.01	23%	20 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	0.00	9%	20 Sept →
train	13–4	-0.05	6%	20 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.04	31%	20 Sept →
vertigo	20–22	-0.02	17%	20 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	17%	20 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	20%	20 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.03	22%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	27%	18 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.00	21%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.02	10%	18 Sept →
overpass	13–10	0.01	11%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	12%	17 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	-0.04	18%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.02	17%	17 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	20%	17 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	30%	17 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.06	13%	17 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.01	28%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.11	27%	17 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.04	13%	16 Sept →
overpass	13–7	0.03	30%	16 Sept →
train	6–13	-0.11	5%	16 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	15%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	19%	16 Sept →
train	13–6	0.01	18%	16 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	12%	16 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.06	12%	16 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	15%	15 Sept →
train	10–13	-0.01	19%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	14%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	13%	15 Sept →
inferno	4–11	-0.11	8%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	4%	14 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	18%	14 Sept →
train	5–13	-0.12	36%	14 Sept →
overpass	9–13	0.02	24%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	17%	14 Sept →
nuke	6–13	0.06	17%	14 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.08	17%	14 Sept →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.01	32%	12 Sept →
overpass	4–9	-0.10	20%	12 Sept →
nuke	9–6	0.07	7%	12 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	23%	12 Sept →
train	13–11	0.02	25%	12 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	16%	11 Sept →
anubis	12–16	-0.07	27%	11 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.03	15%	11 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	29%	11 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	33%	11 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.06	34%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.01	18%	11 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	33%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	29%	10 Sept →
overpass	13–10	-0.03	15%	10 Sept →
train	7–13	0.00	17%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.00	21%	10 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.02	14%	10 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	18%	10 Sept →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	16%	9 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.04	33%	9 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.01	15%	9 Sept →
train	13–16	-0.06	9%	9 Sept →
inferno	15–19	-0.05	10%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	-0.06	30%	8 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	14%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.03	38%	7 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	13%	7 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.01	20%	7 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	7%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.01	21%	7 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.01	14%	7 Sept →
overpass	10–13	-0.00	19%	7 Sept →
overpass	13–8	0.00	17%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	20%	5 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.02	15%	5 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.02	25%	5 Sept →
overpass	13–10	-0.00	10%	5 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.00	26%	3 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.08	24%	3 Sept →
train	13–9	-0.01	29%	3 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.04	18%	3 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.02	17%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	18%	31 Aug →
train	7–13	-0.03	15%	31 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	10%	31 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	21%	31 Aug →
mirage	15–19	-0.02	28%	31 Aug →
office	10–13	0.03	33%	30 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	30%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	33%	29 Aug →
overpass	13–16	-0.03	10%	29 Aug →