Axed

Axed — CS2 Stats

US76561198094514426[U:1:134248698]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,517Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,508Top 5% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9213 of 252583 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,508 -1,388 11 Apr – 15 Oct · 15 days played
26,41629,085peak 29,08511 Apr15 Oct
Faceit ELO: 3,143 +0 2 Sept – 25 Sept · 5 observations
3,1433,143peak 3,1432 Sept25 Sept
29,085Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,143Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-04-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,577 below peak (29,085)
  • +92 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,492 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAxedFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,508 · Red bandPEAK ELO3,143csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning51
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64–32–4Last 10064%Win rateLWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −6.9pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 468ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time485ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 485ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 9 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · cache, 5 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2918–1162%0.02
cacheA1610–663%0.03
infernoS139–469%0.01
ancientB105–550%-0.01
dust2S107–370%0.02
nukeA106–460%0.04
overpass—43–175%0.05
anubis—33–0100%0.04
vertigo—20–20%0.05
train—11–0100%0.03
office—11–0100%0.09
alpine—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,456Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32954%1.1415.7
Ancient16651%1.1015.0
Inferno11530%1.0114.3
Dust29957%1.0414.2
Nuke9352%1.0214.7
Anubis9156%1.1414.8
Overpass4257%1.0816.6
Vertigo2839%1.0915.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.5%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
478msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
13.31HE damage / grenade
10.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3222% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0117%15 Oct →
dust213–40.0216%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.036%15 Oct →
mirage7–130.0117%15 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.017%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.107%14 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.027%14 Oct →
dust213–70.0320%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.0013%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.0514%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0531%28 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0115%5 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.1017%5 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0328%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.028%5 Sept →
inferno13–20.0621%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0416%27 Aug →
nuke9–130.0022%27 Aug →
nuke9–130.0022%27 Aug →
ancient13–80.0613%25 Aug →
mirage13–80.0815%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0111%21 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0017%20 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0114%20 Aug →
nuke13–50.0126%20 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.096%10 Aug →
vertigo10–130.0422%7 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0819%7 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0521%5 Aug →
mirage4–50.0513%2 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.095%2 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0012%2 Aug →
anubis13–80.0924%1 Aug →
ancient13–100.0319%28 Jul →
mirage12–120.0026%28 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0022%20 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0317%20 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0118%19 Jul →
nuke13–100.0521%16 Jul →
cache3–70.0319%15 Jul →
cache13–50.0914%14 Jul →
mirage13–80.0518%13 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0314%9 Jul →
cache13–100.0316%9 Jul →
nuke13–90.0710%9 Jul →
ancient13–10.0130%9 Jul →
mirage13–30.1321%9 Jul →
train13–90.0328%8 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.046%8 Jul →
office13–40.0926%27 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0112%22 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0913%22 Jun →
inferno16–130.1127%15 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0216%12 Jun →
ancient5–130.019%12 Jun →
dust213–90.0519%12 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.105%4 Jun →
vertigo9–130.0620%3 Jun →
inferno13–50.0718%1 Jun →
dust212–120.0219%24 May →
mirage13–40.0821%20 May →
dust216–140.0715%20 May →
mirage13–20.0616%20 May →
mirage0–30.000%19 May →
mirage13–40.1119%16 May →
nuke13–100.0812%16 May →
mirage13–110.0722%15 May →
dust211–13-0.0318%15 May →
cache5–70.0417%14 May →
cache7–8-0.0021%12 May →
ancient6–13-0.0312%12 May →
cache13–90.0019%12 May →
nuke13–30.1120%10 May →
cache12–120.1012%10 May →
mirage13–90.0720%8 May →
cache12–120.0922%5 May →
cache9–10.0433%5 May →
cache13–110.0417%4 May →
cache13–9-0.0322%3 May →
cache13–30.0514%2 May →
cache9–60.0524%2 May →
cache13–110.0019%2 May →
inferno13–50.0510%1 May →
nuke13–20.0325%1 May →
inferno7–13-0.0513%29 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0418%29 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0113%25 Apr →
mirage0–90.000%25 Apr →
mirage13–20.0721%24 Apr →
alpine13–50.0216%24 Apr →
overpass10–10.0711%24 Apr →
dust213–50.0928%24 Apr →
overpass13–60.0426%22 Apr →
nuke9–130.0210%18 Apr →
overpass13–30.0613%18 Apr →
inferno13–30.1318%17 Apr →
anubis13–4-0.0319%17 Apr →
mirage13–80.0222%16 Apr →
overpass2–80.048%16 Apr →
mirage13–60.0310%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.