☂BRICK BY BRICK

☂BRICK BY BRICK — CS2 Stats

NO76561198093816306[U:1:133550578]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,029Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,520Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15967 of 240878 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,520 → 25,520
0Faceit ELO · 2,808 → 2,808
+6Tracked matches · now 2,029
−3.5ppWin rate · 58.6% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 27 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,520 -3,134 27 Feb13 Sept · 16 days played
25,52030,791peak 30,79127 Feb13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,808 +0 30 Aug13 Sept · 4 observations
2,8082,808peak 2,80830 Aug13 Sept
30,791Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,808Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-02-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,808
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 192 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,271 below peak (30,791)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,480 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☂BRICK BY BRICKPREMIER25,520 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,808csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning58
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54406Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time499ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy31.4%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 31.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–9 · vertigo, 6 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · cache, 16 May
359msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · ancient, 10 May
13–1Biggest win · cache, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 90% over 10anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%0.01
dust2C167944%0.01
cacheB126650%0.03
infernoS109190%0.04
vertigoC94544%0.06
ancientB84450%0.02
nukeA74357%0.02
anubisD5050%0.04
shelter32167%0.09
boulder330100%0.10
overpass330100%0.09
stronghold21150%0.09
fachwerk1010%0.04
train110100%0.00
warden110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,531Matches
63%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
89.3ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2952%1.1718.0
Dust22552%1.3518.4
Ancient2361%1.4019.4
Inferno2176%1.4218.1
Overpass1369%1.5117.3
Nuke1346%1.1519.0
Cache771%1.7121.4
Anubis667%1.4122.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
516msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
14.56HE damage / grenade
10.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.345% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo8–130.0326%23 Sept
shelter7–40.0445%23 Sept
boulder9–30.1730%23 Sept
inferno13–60.0330%9 Sept
anubis6–130.0241%28 Aug
ancient13–70.0728%27 Aug
mirage3–4-0.0056%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0035%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0132%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0121%26 Aug
dust20–2-0.010%25 Aug
nuke13–40.1330%25 Aug
vertigo3–130.0441%14 Aug
inferno13–40.0725%14 Aug
fachwerk12–120.0457%6 Aug
boulder13–30.0842%6 Aug
cache13–100.0235%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0529%29 Jul
nuke13–70.0338%29 Jul
dust213–60.0132%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0134%27 Jul
cache13–10.1133%24 Jul
anubis3–130.0733%24 Jul
cache13–70.0231%23 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0227%23 Jul
ancient3–130.0524%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0824%18 Jul
mirage0–2-0.080%17 Jul
dust210–2-0.0833%17 Jul
cache13–10.1426%17 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0038%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0121%17 Jul
shelter13–80.0835%12 Jul
mirage13–40.1024%12 Jul
shelter11–130.1532%11 Jul
boulder13–30.0536%10 Jul
anubis3–130.0131%6 Jul
vertigo13–90.2030%6 Jul
cache12–120.0330%6 Jul
ancient9–130.0830%3 Jul
vertigo3–130.0232%7 Jun
vertigo13–100.0437%4 Jun
vertigo2–130.0233%4 Jun
cache12–120.0740%4 Jun
stronghold11–130.0924%31 May
mirage13–110.0634%31 May
dust214–160.0332%26 May
dust20–4-0.0643%26 May
cache12–120.0228%25 May
train13–40.0030%25 May
warden13–30.1043%24 May
overpass5–00.1347%24 May
anubis12–120.0523%24 May
nuke3–13-0.0150%24 May
dust213–70.0527%24 May
inferno13–80.0820%23 May
cache13–10.0723%23 May
cache12–120.0515%23 May
mirage3–13-0.0135%21 May
nuke14–16-0.0222%20 May
mirage16–120.0325%19 May
inferno13–70.1130%19 May
mirage10–130.0533%16 May
dust213–90.0538%16 May
dust26–130.0333%16 May
inferno13–70.0242%16 May
cache0–7-0.08100%16 May
dust20–130.0132%15 May
ancient13–10-0.0822%12 May
ancient13–10.0331%10 May
overpass13–60.0832%10 May
dust29–130.0739%9 May
inferno13–30.0026%9 May
mirage13–110.0946%9 May
mirage0–3-0.090%9 May
mirage13–90.0434%8 May
nuke13–80.0333%8 May
dust26–130.0224%8 May
mirage10–13-0.0429%7 May
ancient13–9-0.0130%6 May
mirage13–9-0.0331%6 May
dust213–30.0830%6 May
dust213–9-0.0014%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.0433%29 Apr
cache13–70.0226%29 Apr
dust20–2-0.010%28 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0236%21 Apr
inferno16–130.0334%21 Mar
overpass13–70.0631%21 Mar
mirage5–130.0239%9 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0428%5 Mar
anubis3–90.0436%5 Mar
mirage5–130.1030%5 Mar
vertigo13–30.1232%5 Mar
vertigo13–70.0647%1 Mar
stronghold13–100.0932%1 Mar
dust213–7-0.0240%28 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0225%28 Feb
inferno13–90.0627%27 Feb
ancient5–130.0932%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →