A1exqnder — CS2 Stats

76561198091223230[U:1:130957502]✓ No bans

1,377Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,203Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2764 of 13254 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGA1exqnderFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,203 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning48
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLWLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.1
Utility4.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time531ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–9
130Biggest win — train
7Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1710759%0.04
cacheD1551033%-0.01
officeD124833%-0.01
overpassD113827%0.03
ancientS107370%-0.01
mirageA106460%-0.03
anubisD82625%-0.02
nukeC83538%0.01
fachwerk2020%-0.05
boulder220100%0.06
vertigo110100%-0.01
train110100%0.08
italy110100%-0.01
shelter110100%0.03
dust21010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

336Matches
51%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1060%1.8319.2
Dust2850%1.0615.0
Nuke771%1.6819.0
Mirage771%1.7620.6
Anubis2100%0.8215.0
Ancient250%1.0915.5
Cache250%1.5221.5
Train2100%1.1516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
521msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
36.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.33HE damage / grenade
11.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9989% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0017%28 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0019%28 Aug
fachwerk6–13-0.0119%27 Aug
overpass5–130.0127%27 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0121%27 Aug
train13–00.0819%26 Aug
office13–60.0315%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0818%22 Aug
inferno7–130.1012%22 Aug
office9–13-0.0625%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.019%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0313%15 Aug
overpass9–130.0319%15 Aug
inferno13–90.1414%15 Aug
office9–13-0.0427%15 Aug
overpass13–60.1118%13 Aug
office8–130.0625%12 Aug
office10–13-0.0311%12 Aug
office3–130.0320%12 Aug
boulder13–60.0614%11 Aug
office7–13-0.0914%11 Aug
office9–130.0332%11 Aug
italy13–9-0.0139%11 Aug
anubis9–130.0119%9 Aug
nuke9–130.0820%9 Aug
shelter13–70.0321%8 Aug
fachwerk8–13-0.0821%8 Aug
boulder13–110.0616%8 Aug
office11–130.0111%6 Aug
overpass12–12-0.0210%4 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0020%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0814%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0720%2 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0117%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0422%1 Aug
mirage13–90.0020%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0126%1 Aug
anubis16–140.0118%31 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0414%31 Jul
cache13–4-0.0118%31 Jul
mirage5–10.0213%31 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0624%31 Jul
cache13–110.0017%29 Jul
cache1–13-0.0624%29 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0229%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.039%29 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0014%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0120%29 Jul
overpass9–130.1219%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0318%28 Jul
cache1–130.0130%27 Jul
office13–6-0.0311%27 Jul
nuke8–130.0115%24 Jul
inferno8–130.0226%22 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0520%20 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0327%20 Jul
nuke7–130.0622%20 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%20 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0743%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0624%20 Jul
cache6–130.0020%17 Jul
ancient13–50.0524%17 Jul
ancient13–30.0317%16 Jul
inferno13–60.0424%15 Jul
ancient13–90.0119%14 Jul
cache14–160.0420%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0619%14 Jul
inferno1–130.0017%14 Jul
inferno5–20.0623%14 Jul
cache13–20.0227%14 Jul
inferno2–7-0.0327%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0115%14 Jul
inferno13–00.0616%14 Jul
inferno12–120.0413%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.086%13 Jul
cache13–50.0519%13 Jul
office13–5-0.0325%13 Jul
office13–3-0.0527%13 Jul
overpass13–80.0020%7 Jul
cache13–90.0219%7 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0112%5 Jul
nuke13–40.0420%5 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1016%5 Jul
overpass13–6-0.0326%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.0519%3 Jul
overpass12–120.0215%1 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0958%30 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0519%30 Jun
inferno13–20.0922%29 Jun
cache7–13-0.0125%29 Jun
overpass10–130.0019%29 Jun
nuke13–80.0318%28 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0112%28 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0233%28 Jun
inferno9–40.1124%27 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0520%27 Jun
overpass5–130.1216%27 Jun
inferno13–50.0022%16 Jun
cache1–13-0.0535%16 Jun
inferno4–130.0521%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →