simp. — CS2 Stats

76561198090421527[U:1:130155799]✓ No bans

1,412Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,904Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1178 of 9856 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsimp.FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,904 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning53
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateLLLWWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time513ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.01
dust2A27151256%-0.00
cacheC1871139%0.01
anubisA127558%0.01
infernoD82625%0.01
ancient43175%0.03
nuke3030%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

786Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21050%0.9915.7
Anubis11150%0.9015.2
Dust29044%1.0016.3
Inferno5749%1.1215.6
Vertigo2152%1.0016.4
Overpass2152%0.9315.2
Nuke1331%0.8115.7
Ancient862%0.9813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
516msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
14.7%Flash assists
11.38HE damage / grenade
6.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0220%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0923%28 Aug
cache8–130.0323%28 Aug
dust216–14-0.0417%28 Aug
mirage13–10.0519%26 Aug
cache10–130.0928%25 Aug
dust213–60.1124%25 Aug
dust215–15-0.0116%25 Aug
cache13–10-0.0515%24 Aug
mirage0–13-0.1611%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0218%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.029%22 Aug
cache7–130.0414%22 Aug
dust213–1-0.018%22 Aug
dust213–6-0.032%22 Aug
anubis13–40.0226%16 Aug
mirage13–30.0418%16 Aug
mirage3–130.0024%15 Aug
dust215–15-0.0019%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0418%15 Aug
cache12–160.0326%15 Aug
cache13–110.0417%15 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0527%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0932%15 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0015%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0313%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0628%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0614%13 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0420%13 Aug
anubis13–100.029%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.0130%12 Aug
mirage13–110.0619%12 Aug
cache8–130.0721%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0028%9 Aug
cache6–13-0.017%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0611%8 Aug
dust24–0-0.0210%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0227%8 Aug
dust215–15-0.0219%8 Aug
dust23–0-0.040%8 Aug
dust216–12-0.0113%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.073%7 Aug
cache13–30.0117%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0830%7 Aug
dust213–5-0.0023%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0514%4 Aug
mirage13–90.1019%4 Aug
anubis11–130.0419%4 Aug
dust213–100.0420%4 Aug
mirage16–120.009%4 Aug
dust216–120.0514%4 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0311%2 Aug
inferno8–130.0719%2 Aug
cache7–130.0114%2 Aug
dust213–70.1312%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0120%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0417%1 Aug
ancient13–20.0626%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0333%1 Aug
mirage5–130.0432%1 Aug
cache2–13-0.0425%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0011%1 Aug
anubis13–90.048%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.0323%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0714%31 Jul
anubis16–120.0412%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0326%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0615%31 Jul
ancient10–13-0.016%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0119%30 Jul
mirage15–150.0815%30 Jul
dust213–10-0.0118%30 Jul
anubis15–150.0414%30 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0113%30 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0838%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0311%28 Jul
mirage16–140.0619%28 Jul
dust27–13-0.0412%28 Jul
mirage13–70.099%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0916%28 Jul
anubis9–130.0318%28 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0325%28 Jul
dust216–13-0.0020%28 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0411%28 Jul
cache13–100.0227%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0711%28 Jul
mirage7–130.0019%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0112%27 Jul
dust213–110.1026%27 Jul
inferno13–110.058%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0021%27 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0413%27 Jul
cache13–80.0118%27 Jul
inferno11–130.0517%27 Jul
dust213–90.0315%27 Jul
mirage16–140.0113%27 Jul
cache13–9-0.0114%26 Jul
anubis13–40.0226%26 Jul
cache13–110.0623%26 Jul
dust29–130.0420%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →