-ChrissiTw0w- — CS2 Stats

76561198087791588[U:1:127525860]

925Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,620Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3633 of 15382 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,620Peak Premier on CSDB
1,878Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,878
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,620
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,380 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-ChrissiTw0w-PREMIER23,620 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,878csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61372Last 10061%Win rateLWLWWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression5.3
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time569ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–1
130Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 21anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA28171161%-0.00
dust2S2116576%-0.02
ancientB179853%-0.04
nukeA106460%0.02
anubisD93633%-0.02
infernoA85363%0.01
mirage42250%-0.01
overpass220100%-0.04
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

215Matches
61%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
64.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23468%0.8713.1
Anubis1258%0.9712.5
Mirage1050%1.0613.3
Ancient875%0.8214.5
Cache888%1.2414.6
Inferno771%1.0416.6
Nuke540%0.9310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
562msReaction time
22.2%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.186% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0329%14 Aug
dust213–8-0.0335%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0510%14 Aug
cache13–7-0.0120%12 Aug
cache13–90.0521%10 Aug
dust213–70.0519%9 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0317%9 Aug
cache13–70.0825%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0523%9 Aug
cache2–13-0.0119%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0233%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0317%6 Aug
dust213–100.0527%6 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0113%6 Aug
cache13–60.0135%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0117%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0913%27 Jul
ancient1–13-0.093%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0317%20 Jul
dust213–2-0.0021%20 Jul
cache12–120.0330%20 Jul
cache1–13-0.0621%28 Jun
cache10–130.0218%15 Jun
cache0–13-0.040%14 Jun
cache13–11-0.0112%7 Jun
nuke6–130.0520%7 Jun
cache11–130.0219%4 Jun
cache13–30.0112%4 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0522%3 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0316%3 Jun
dust213–5-0.0724%1 Jun
cache11–13-0.0318%1 Jun
cache13–7-0.0420%1 Jun
cache13–70.0816%31 May
dust216–120.0526%30 May
cache9–13-0.0512%30 May
cache0–13-0.110%30 May
cache13–2-0.0227%29 May
anubis10–130.0420%29 May
cache13–11-0.0311%29 May
cache9–13-0.0219%28 May
cache13–9-0.0535%28 May
cache9–13-0.0329%26 May
cache13–10.1215%26 May
cache13–30.0130%25 May
mirage9–13-0.0312%24 May
ancient13–3-0.0318%24 May
inferno8–13-0.0319%24 May
ancient13–6-0.0217%21 May
dust213–7-0.0219%19 May
cache13–8-0.0018%9 May
cache13–20.0323%9 May
cache13–5-0.0121%8 May
cache13–7-0.0522%26 Apr
ancient19–160.0122%16 Apr
dust213–5-0.0432%26 Mar
ancient0–5-0.0329%24 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0127%24 Mar
ancient14–160.0217%13 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0122%13 Mar
dust212–160.0215%13 Mar
inferno13–70.0316%12 Mar
nuke13–00.0726%12 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0314%27 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0624%27 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0320%27 Feb
ancient13–9-0.045%20 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0215%20 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0117%20 Feb
anubis16–13-0.0121%19 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0121%13 Feb
nuke13–50.0734%13 Feb
anubis13–60.0229%10 Feb
nuke13–00.0832%10 Feb
dust219–17-0.0227%10 Feb
dust213–8-0.037%9 Feb
dust25–13-0.099%9 Feb
mirage13–90.0233%5 Feb
inferno13–40.0720%5 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0528%23 Jan
dust213–20.0311%23 Jan
inferno16–140.0725%30 Dec
dust25–13-0.0733%22 Dec
ancient11–13-0.079%21 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0217%21 Dec
dust213–10-0.0735%21 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0433%21 Dec
dust213–100.0120%29 Nov
nuke13–40.0926%29 Nov
mirage13–20.0441%29 Nov
train13–6-0.0415%29 Nov
dust213–10-0.0415%16 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0621%16 Nov
overpass13–10-0.0410%16 Nov
anubis10–13-0.0217%15 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0418%12 Nov
dust213–7-0.0220%12 Nov
dust26–130.0218%11 Nov
inferno13–90.0023%11 Nov
ancient13–9-0.1113%10 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →