-ChrissiTw0w-

-ChrissiTw0w- — CS2 Stats

76561198087791588[U:1:127525860]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

935Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,716Top 25% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33471 of 247942 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,878 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 935 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,716 -956 16 Nov – 19 Sept · 17 days played
23,62028,405peak 28,40516 Nov19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,878 +0 28 Aug – 19 Sept · 2 observations
1,8781,878peak 1,87828 Aug19 Sept
28,405Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,878Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-11-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,878
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,689 below peak (28,405)
  • +96 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,284 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-ChrissiTw0w-FACEITLevel 10 · 1,878 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,716 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,878csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–37–2Last 10061%Win rateWLWLWLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time566ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 26 May →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 29 Nov →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · cache, 14 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 12 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 77% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2817–1161%-0.00
dust2S2217–577%-0.02
ancientB168–850%-0.03
nukeA106–460%0.02
anubisD93–633%-0.02
infernoA74–357%0.01
mirageA53–260%0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.04
train—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
61%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
63.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23967%0.8613.1
Anubis1354%0.9412.5
Cache1090%1.1713.9
Mirage1050%1.0613.3
Nuke838%0.9010.6
Inferno875%1.0115.8
Ancient875%0.8214.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
548msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
9.67HE damage / grenade
8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4646% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0921%7 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0426%7 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0124%4 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0329%14 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0335%14 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0510%14 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0120%12 Aug →
cache13–90.0521%10 Aug →
dust213–70.0519%9 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0317%9 Aug →
cache13–70.0825%9 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0523%9 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0119%6 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0233%6 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0317%6 Aug →
dust213–100.0527%6 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0113%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0135%29 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0117%27 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0913%27 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.093%22 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0317%20 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0021%20 Jul →
cache12–120.0330%20 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0621%28 Jun →
cache10–130.0218%15 Jun →
cache0–13-0.040%14 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0112%7 Jun →
nuke6–130.0520%7 Jun →
cache11–130.0219%4 Jun →
cache13–30.0112%4 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0522%3 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0316%3 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0724%1 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0318%1 Jun →
cache13–7-0.0420%1 Jun →
cache13–70.0816%31 May →
dust216–120.0526%30 May →
cache9–13-0.0512%30 May →
cache0–13-0.110%30 May →
cache13–2-0.0227%29 May →
anubis10–130.0420%29 May →
cache13–11-0.0311%29 May →
cache9–13-0.0219%28 May →
cache13–9-0.0535%28 May →
cache9–13-0.0329%26 May →
cache13–10.1215%26 May →
cache13–30.0130%25 May →
mirage9–13-0.0312%24 May →
ancient13–3-0.0318%24 May →
inferno8–13-0.0319%24 May →
ancient13–6-0.0217%21 May →
dust213–7-0.0219%19 May →
cache13–8-0.0018%9 May →
cache13–20.0323%9 May →
cache13–5-0.0121%8 May →
cache13–7-0.0522%26 Apr →
ancient19–160.0122%16 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0432%26 Mar →
ancient0–5-0.0329%24 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0127%24 Mar →
ancient14–160.0217%13 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0122%13 Mar →
dust212–160.0215%13 Mar →
inferno13–70.0316%12 Mar →
nuke13–00.0726%12 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0314%27 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0624%27 Feb →
ancient13–3-0.0320%27 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.045%20 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0215%20 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0117%20 Feb →
anubis16–13-0.0121%19 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.0121%13 Feb →
nuke13–50.0734%13 Feb →
anubis13–60.0229%10 Feb →
nuke13–00.0832%10 Feb →
dust219–17-0.0227%10 Feb →
dust213–8-0.037%9 Feb →
dust25–13-0.099%9 Feb →
mirage13–90.0233%5 Feb →
inferno13–40.0720%5 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0528%23 Jan →
dust213–20.0311%23 Jan →
inferno16–140.0725%30 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0733%22 Dec →
ancient11–13-0.079%21 Dec →
ancient9–13-0.0217%21 Dec →
dust213–10-0.0735%21 Dec →
ancient8–13-0.0433%21 Dec →
dust213–100.0120%29 Nov →
nuke13–40.0926%29 Nov →
mirage13–20.0441%29 Nov →
train13–6-0.0415%29 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0415%16 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0621%16 Nov →
overpass13–10-0.0410%16 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0217%15 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0418%12 Nov →
dust213–7-0.0220%12 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.