MH

MH — CS2 Stats

PL76561198085428517[U:1:125162789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,295Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,887Top 50% of 203,074 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84099 of 250038 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,104 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,887 +724 7 Sept – 23 Sept · 4 days played
19,16319,887peak 19,8877 Sept23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,104 +0 1 Sept – 22 Sept · 3 observations
2,1042,104peak 2,1041 Sept22 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,104Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,104
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 396 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,887
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 113 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMHFACEITLevel 10 · 2,104 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,887 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,104csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning59
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 23 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 31 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 8 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2011–955%-0.01
ancientC198–1142%-0.02
mirageD155–1033%-0.03
dust2C145–936%-0.02
infernoS119–282%-0.00
cacheB115–645%0.01
nukeS97–278%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,002Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37850%0.9914.6
Ancient33351%0.9614.7
Anubis25550%0.9914.8
Dust218149%1.0014.3
Inferno16653%0.9814.9
Nuke9054%0.9914.7
Vertigo4833%1.0416.8
Overpass4740%0.8813.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
544msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
9.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–11-0.046%5 Oct →
dust213–80.0219%5 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0518%5 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.1114%29 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1116%29 Sept →
ancient13–50.0521%29 Sept →
cache13–70.0429%29 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0113%29 Sept →
inferno13–100.0513%29 Sept →
ancient13–70.0223%29 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0133%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0112%28 Sept →
inferno13–80.0011%28 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0518%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.1413%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.038%23 Sept →
dust23–130.0316%23 Sept →
inferno6–20.0130%23 Sept →
anubis11–130.079%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.0217%23 Sept →
cache6–130.006%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0116%23 Sept →
mirage6–130.0028%22 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%22 Sept →
dust213–60.1226%22 Sept →
ancient5–130.0235%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0111%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0723%9 Sept →
inferno13–30.0410%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0417%8 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0618%8 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.013%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0232%8 Sept →
ancient9–130.0116%7 Sept →
cache13–10-0.008%7 Sept →
nuke13–40.0320%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0413%3 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0113%2 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0519%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0520%2 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0127%1 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0426%1 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0122%1 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0217%1 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.055%1 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0112%1 Sept →
cache13–50.0421%1 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0114%31 Aug →
cache7–130.0025%31 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.044%31 Aug →
nuke10–130.0516%31 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0216%31 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0137%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0123%31 Aug →
cache8–130.0117%30 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.035%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.044%30 Aug →
inferno13–60.0013%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0314%28 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0323%26 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.1010%26 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0117%26 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0121%26 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.069%5 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0718%5 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0326%5 Aug →
anubis13–70.0012%5 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0112%5 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0437%5 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0311%5 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0210%5 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.115%5 Aug →
inferno13–60.0124%4 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0214%4 Aug →
dust223–25-0.0612%4 Aug →
dust213–110.0319%4 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0215%4 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0710%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0510%4 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0218%4 Aug →
anubis3–130.0113%4 Aug →
nuke14–160.0112%3 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0021%3 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0620%3 Aug →
mirage13–80.0127%3 Aug →
nuke13–90.0820%3 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0717%3 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0217%3 Aug →
dust25–13-0.094%3 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0224%1 Aug →
nuke12–2-0.0318%1 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0630%1 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0418%1 Aug →
ancient16–190.0014%31 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0620%31 Jul →
cache13–50.0719%31 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0019%31 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0615%31 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0212%31 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0245%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.