azzimuch

azzimuch — CS2 Stats

76561198084653295[U:1:124387567]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

517Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,648Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53245 of 220491 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 26 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,648 +6,496 26 Jun14 Sept · 41 days played
14,50922,799peak 22,79926 Jun14 Sept
22,922Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-06-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,151 below peak (22,799)
  • +3,574 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,496 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,352 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGazzimuchPREMIER21,648 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning47
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41545Last 10041%Win rateLLLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.9

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time588ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 12–12 · mirage, 8 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 30 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 24 Aug
13–2Biggest win · cache, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L4Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C34142041%0.00
mirageC1761135%0.00
infernoB179853%0.02
anubisD134931%0.02
nukeC83538%0.00
cacheA74357%0.00
ancient2020%0.02
vertigo1010%0.00
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
582msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
11.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0415%14 Sept
anubis7–130.0121%11 Sept
dust25–13-0.0131%11 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0311%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0322%10 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0126%10 Sept
cache13–20.0426%9 Sept
cache3–13-0.0524%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0411%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0220%9 Sept
dust213–90.0115%8 Sept
anubis13–60.0714%7 Sept
inferno13–40.0420%7 Sept
nuke5–130.0216%7 Sept
anubis15–150.0512%7 Sept
inferno13–70.0320%7 Sept
mirage5–130.008%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0613%4 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0225%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.0514%4 Sept
dust213–110.0112%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0521%3 Sept
cache13–110.0114%3 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0218%3 Sept
dust29–13-0.0133%3 Sept
anubis10–130.0113%3 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0319%2 Sept
dust24–130.0116%2 Sept
dust213–11-0.0410%2 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0026%2 Sept
mirage13–80.0515%2 Sept
dust216–130.0111%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0326%1 Sept
inferno13–50.0720%1 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0219%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0433%30 Aug
inferno13–50.1136%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0426%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0423%30 Aug
dust216–140.0514%29 Aug
dust27–130.0416%27 Aug
dust213–110.0418%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0819%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0221%26 Aug
vertigo9–130.0023%25 Aug
inferno13–90.0915%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0119%24 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0214%23 Aug
dust213–80.0511%23 Aug
dust213–7-0.0119%23 Aug
mirage9–130.0123%22 Aug
dust213–16-0.0012%22 Aug
inferno13–40.0824%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0111%21 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0926%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0810%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0312%18 Aug
inferno3–130.0228%12 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0416%11 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0423%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0631%10 Aug
dust213–50.1024%9 Aug
mirage12–120.1216%8 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0014%7 Aug
ancient8–130.0116%2 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%2 Aug
nuke15–150.0112%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0211%1 Aug
dust29–130.0227%31 Jul
nuke13–30.0529%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.0313%30 Jul
ancient7–130.0215%30 Jul
nuke16–140.0412%27 Jul
dust213–70.1026%27 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0025%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.0119%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0734%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0613%22 Jul
anubis13–50.0513%20 Jul
cache13–80.0120%18 Jul
cache7–130.0528%18 Jul
anubis13–60.0918%17 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0320%17 Jul
dust216–140.0625%17 Jul
dust28–130.0225%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0019%12 Jul
dust26–130.0122%11 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0927%11 Jul
anubis13–160.0420%10 Jul
dust213–60.0518%10 Jul
dust211–130.0013%7 Jul
dust211–13-0.0518%6 Jul
dust213–90.0914%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0325%3 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0122%2 Jul
overpass13–90.0112%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0212%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0114%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0616%27 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0032%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →