Ho☠ng Nak Bi

Ho☠ng Nak Bi — CS2 Stats

VN76561198084190940[U:1:123925212]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,395Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,986Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11925 of 220307 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 12 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,986 -617 12 May15 Sept · 35 days played
22,99028,792peak 28,79212 May15 Sept
28,984Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-05-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,806 below peak (28,792)
  • +1,819 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,222 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,014 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHo☠ng Nak BiFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,986 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning57
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54406Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility2.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.7
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time560ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy27.5%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 31.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 24 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 1 Jul
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · anubis, 21 Jun
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.04
ancientA1911858%0.02
infernoB189950%0.05
anubisD1551033%0.03
cacheS1410471%0.05
nukeS54180%0.03
dust231233%-0.01
train21150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

494Matches
55%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
86.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15152%1.3518.8
Anubis9253%1.3620.0
Inferno7054%1.4818.5
Vertigo5461%1.4019.9
Ancient4856%1.3017.0
Dust23060%1.3920.1
Nuke2662%1.5420.1
Overpass425%1.5225.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
549msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
1.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3279 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0325%15 Sept
nuke13–60.1333%15 Sept
ancient13–110.0832%14 Sept
cache13–30.0338%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0319%6 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0233%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0124%6 Sept
inferno9–130.0742%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0218%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0227%5 Sept
anubis12–120.0532%5 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0150%5 Sept
cache13–9-0.0233%5 Sept
ancient13–80.0122%2 Sept
cache13–90.0638%31 Aug
anubis13–70.0833%29 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0717%29 Aug
cache13–100.0418%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0435%26 Aug
inferno13–100.1121%26 Aug
cache13–70.1215%25 Aug
mirage9–130.1018%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0123%24 Aug
cache13–30.2131%24 Aug
cache13–80.0340%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%22 Aug
mirage13–60.0820%22 Aug
inferno13–00.1238%22 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0529%21 Aug
ancient1–2-0.150%21 Aug
ancient13–90.0834%20 Aug
cache3–13-0.0122%20 Aug
ancient13–10.1232%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0735%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0530%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0134%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0721%16 Aug
inferno13–70.0217%16 Aug
inferno3–00.0133%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0335%16 Aug
inferno13–90.1030%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0840%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0738%15 Aug
cache8–130.0721%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0330%12 Aug
train3–130.0131%12 Aug
train13–20.1143%12 Aug
inferno12–120.1027%9 Aug
anubis10–130.0433%9 Aug
mirage13–110.1442%9 Aug
ancient13–80.1228%8 Aug
inferno15–150.0929%8 Aug
ancient13–70.0426%6 Aug
anubis13–30.1032%4 Aug
mirage11–130.1240%4 Aug
inferno13–60.0327%4 Aug
mirage13–80.0417%30 Jul
dust213–110.0225%29 Jul
ancient13–50.0541%29 Jul
cache9–130.0130%29 Jul
mirage13–110.1029%25 Jul
mirage10–130.0523%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0825%22 Jul
mirage13–00.000%22 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0238%18 Jul
inferno13–40.1533%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0526%18 Jul
ancient13–20.1322%14 Jul
ancient0–13-0.100%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0518%11 Jul
anubis0–4-0.0467%11 Jul
cache16–140.1140%11 Jul
cache13–100.0832%9 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0520%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0635%4 Jul
cache13–50.1141%4 Jul
nuke0–2-0.030%2 Jul
ancient13–20.0171%2 Jul
mirage0–3-0.00100%1 Jul
mirage13–70.0533%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0137%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0425%27 Jun
inferno13–90.0623%24 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0726%23 Jun
mirage13–70.1147%21 Jun
inferno10–130.0126%21 Jun
anubis0–13-0.0425%21 Jun
anubis13–100.1330%17 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0032%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0132%13 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0523%13 Jun
ancient6–130.0226%29 May
mirage13–6-0.0324%25 May
inferno12–120.0124%22 May
cache1–13-0.0825%20 May
nuke13–50.0630%16 May
anubis5–130.0429%15 May
mirage12–120.0021%13 May
anubis13–110.0826%13 May
dust26–13-0.0028%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →