Daniel Larson — CS2 Stats

76561198084004628[U:1:123738900]

385Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating14,947Blue band · top ~28.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11486 of 17696 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaniel LarsonPREMIER14,947 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning46
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateWLLTWWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression4.0
Utility5.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time574ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy10.1%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 6.6% → last ⅓ avg 10.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
3Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC2291341%-0.01
mirageC1761135%-0.01
cacheA169756%0.00
infernoA148657%0.02
nukeC104640%-0.01
ancient42250%-0.01
anubis3030%-0.00
dust231233%0.02
vertigo21150%-0.04
shelter2020%-0.06
italy2020%-0.05
fachwerk110100%-0.00
boulder110100%-0.05
alpine110100%0.04
stronghold1010%-0.08
overpass1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
28%Win rate
0.57Avg K/D
ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.9%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
568msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.00HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.8993% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4173 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4249% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0117%18 Aug
nuke6–13-0.066%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.066%16 Aug
mirage15–150.0011%15 Aug
inferno13–80.1017%15 Aug
cache13–90.0614%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0021%9 Aug
cache13–50.0412%9 Aug
office12–12-0.004%8 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0312%3 Aug
nuke13–90.015%2 Aug
cache14–160.013%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.019%2 Aug
nuke13–70.028%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.036%2 Aug
mirage9–130.004%1 Aug
cache13–100.0712%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.013%1 Aug
anubis13–160.0312%1 Aug
ancient14–16-0.038%1 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0210%1 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0211%31 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0719%31 Jul
shelter3–13-0.108%31 Jul
office13–90.0110%27 Jul
inferno13–90.0522%27 Jul
cache13–9-0.026%25 Jul
office11–13-0.036%25 Jul
dust213–50.0412%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.018%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0213%25 Jul
cache11–130.0212%25 Jul
cache13–50.038%25 Jul
nuke6–13-0.055%25 Jul
inferno13–70.0013%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0320%24 Jul
mirage10–13-0.037%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0610%24 Jul
inferno13–10.0310%24 Jul
ancient16–120.0313%23 Jul
cache13–110.0110%20 Jul
inferno10–130.014%20 Jul
cache9–13-0.0412%19 Jul
dust29–130.019%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.017%18 Jul
office13–70.0529%18 Jul
cache13–50.0315%11 Jul
mirage14–16-0.058%11 Jul
nuke13–5-0.025%11 Jul
mirage13–40.027%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.047%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0219%11 Jul
cache13–16-0.0010%10 Jul
office12–12-0.034%10 Jul
office9–13-0.0615%10 Jul
fachwerk13–6-0.0018%10 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0517%9 Jul
ancient10–10.035%9 Jul
shelter7–13-0.0214%9 Jul
inferno13–30.1314%9 Jul
italy12–12-0.0616%7 Jul
office5–13-0.0631%7 Jul
mirage6–13-0.045%5 Jul
office4–130.0218%3 Jul
alpine13–110.0410%3 Jul
office13–90.099%3 Jul
stronghold7–13-0.083%2 Jul
office13–60.016%2 Jul
office13–4-0.043%26 Jun
office11–13-0.025%26 Jun
office13–9-0.023%22 Jun
office13–11-0.014%21 Jun
ancient6–13-0.055%19 Jun
office1–13-0.050%17 Jun
office13–10-0.0713%12 Jun
dust210–130.0110%11 Jun
nuke10–13-0.050%11 Jun
office12–120.069%11 Jun
mirage5–13-0.023%8 Jun
mirage13–80.014%7 Jun
inferno9–13-0.055%7 Jun
italy12–12-0.036%7 Jun
inferno8–13-0.023%7 Jun
mirage12–160.0813%6 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0111%6 Jun
mirage13–11-0.015%6 Jun
office10–13-0.038%5 Jun
cache10–13-0.083%5 Jun
office4–13-0.099%5 Jun
office6–130.007%3 Jun
office7–13-0.053%1 Jun
anubis9–13-0.026%25 May
mirage0–13-0.055%25 May
overpass6–13-0.0016%24 May
nuke13–90.0718%24 May
mirage13–8-0.018%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0413%24 May
inferno13–100.037%23 May
office13–100.116%23 May
inferno13–90.083%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →