Neo

Neo — CS2 Stats

FR76561198083851476[U:1:123585748]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

272Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,085Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,852Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 272 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,852 -1,147 14 May – 25 Oct · 20 days played
17,88519,999peak 19,99914 May25 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-03-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,147 below peak (19,999)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,148 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.6%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy15.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.14 short
Match win rate79.3%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,852 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning63
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time582ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 10 Mar →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 14 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · overpass, 14 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 6 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
11–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C238–1535%0.03
mirageA1911–858%0.01
ancientB137–654%0.01
infernoA127–558%0.03
nukeB115–645%0.03
overpassB105–550%0.01
anubisD61–517%0.01
cacheA53–260%0.05
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,286Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
7,256Matches
79.3%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 8 players
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
10,600MVPs
2,106Hours (in match)
2,321Bombs planted
688Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,747
AWP9,862
SSG 082,186
P901,609
Knife1,562
P2501,419

Lifetime map wins

8,717dust2
3,728inferno
1,065nuke
1,012aztec
401cbble
381train
299office
243shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
56%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
88.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3145%1.3619.6
Dust22857%1.4018.3
Ancient2268%1.3618.2
Inferno1567%1.1818.1
Anubis1443%1.2018.0
Cache967%1.4418.0
Nuke560%1.1818.6
Overpass250%0.7012.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
588msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
16.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4035% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–16-0.0418%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0322%11 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0424%9 Aug →
inferno19–170.0415%9 Aug →
ancient16–140.0619%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0215%8 Aug →
mirage13–110.0314%6 Aug →
vertigo19–170.0723%6 Aug →
ancient13–10.0016%6 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0214%2 Aug →
cache4–130.0630%27 Jul →
cache13–50.0517%26 Jul →
dust213–100.018%25 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0124%24 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0134%19 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0121%19 Jul →
cache14–160.0018%16 Jul →
mirage13–90.0618%16 Jul →
ancient13–70.1018%15 Jul →
mirage16–140.0620%14 Jul →
nuke19–170.0218%13 Jul →
ancient13–70.0225%12 Jul →
ancient11–130.0524%10 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0017%10 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0225%10 Jul →
anubis13–70.0934%7 Jul →
overpass13–90.0218%6 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0436%5 Jul →
inferno10–130.0234%5 Jul →
cache13–30.1429%5 Jul →
dust213–70.0717%4 Jul →
nuke13–100.0318%2 Jul →
anubis19–220.0721%1 Jul →
cache16–130.0235%30 Jun →
dust216–140.1430%30 Jun →
mirage11–130.0326%21 Jun →
overpass10–00.1029%21 Jun →
dust213–110.0617%21 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0618%15 Jun →
inferno13–80.0218%15 Jun →
ancient8–130.0115%14 Jun →
overpass13–50.0118%14 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0742%14 Jun →
mirage13–40.0614%13 Jun →
mirage6–130.0114%12 Jun →
inferno13–70.0127%9 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0318%9 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0127%9 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0415%8 Jun →
overpass13–90.0219%8 Jun →
mirage9–130.0326%8 Jun →
inferno13–40.0928%7 Jun →
overpass13–4-0.0418%7 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0013%6 Jun →
dust25–130.0122%2 Jun →
nuke13–80.0729%2 Jun →
nuke10–130.0628%1 Jun →
inferno16–140.0418%31 May →
dust211–130.0621%31 May →
mirage13–70.0125%31 May →
dust28–130.0927%31 May →
inferno8–13-0.0421%31 May →
dust213–30.0233%31 May →
ancient16–130.0329%30 May →
ancient13–70.0425%30 May →
nuke13–100.0425%30 May →
dust215–15-0.0537%30 May →
dust213–60.1332%30 May →
overpass6–13-0.0119%29 May →
mirage13–11-0.0228%29 May →
dust28–130.0317%29 May →
inferno8–130.0138%29 May →
nuke11–130.0122%29 May →
nuke10–130.0020%29 May →
mirage7–10-0.045%22 May →
dust213–80.0423%17 May →
dust29–130.0313%17 May →
mirage13–9-0.0011%16 May →
dust27–130.0227%16 May →
overpass11–130.1224%15 May →
ancient15–15-0.0218%15 May →
nuke15–15-0.0516%14 May →
ancient13–60.0210%14 May →
mirage13–10-0.047%14 May →
nuke8–130.0722%13 May →
dust211–13-0.0118%13 May →
mirage6–13-0.0321%13 May →
nuke13–100.0828%12 May →
dust215–150.0233%12 May →
mirage15–15-0.0223%12 May →
inferno10–13-0.0123%5 May →
overpass10–13-0.0314%4 May →
inferno4–130.0413%3 May →
dust215–150.0220%3 May →
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 May →
ancient2–13-0.0838%2 May →
inferno7–00.0520%2 May →
inferno13–100.0425%2 May →
mirage13–80.049%10 Mar →
dust213–80.1630%10 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.