EroTec.™

EroTec.™ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198082035975[U:1:121770247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,507Tracked matches73%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,306Top 10% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10536 of 251159 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,000 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,306 +707 23 Jul – 9 Oct · 21 days played
25,32026,640peak 26,64023 Jul9 Oct
26,642Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-07-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,000
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 334 below peak (26,640)
  • +653 over 30 days · improving
  • +707 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,694 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEroTec.™FACEITLevel 9 · 2,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,306 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 3 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 21 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 85% over 13nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2210–1245%0.01
anubisB2111–1052%0.00
infernoA2011–955%-0.01
dust2S1311–285%0.01
cacheS96–367%0.02
mirageS75–271%-0.01
nukeD72–529%-0.02
office—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,012Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
69.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient17957%1.1314.7
Inferno16451%1.1013.9
Dust214646%1.0814.2
Anubis13347%1.0013.6
Nuke6951%1.0314.1
Mirage6146%1.2212.8
Overpass3759%0.9413.0
Vertigo2548%0.9813.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
507msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
26.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
19.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.1266% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.1016%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0115%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.0218%9 Oct →
cache3–130.0118%9 Oct →
anubis13–50.0621%8 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0510%8 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0213%8 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0118%4 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0415%3 Oct →
dust213–10.034%3 Oct →
cache13–00.1224%3 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0227%3 Oct →
inferno9–60.0615%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0326%2 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0313%2 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0412%30 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0113%30 Sept →
ancient22–200.0317%30 Sept →
inferno9–00.0918%30 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0220%29 Sept →
cache13–7-0.038%28 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0237%28 Sept →
cache13–70.0420%28 Sept →
inferno22–19-0.0216%27 Sept →
anubis7–130.0112%27 Sept →
dust213–70.0214%26 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0014%26 Sept →
mirage13–20.019%25 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0215%25 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0611%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0314%23 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0230%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.0316%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.0215%22 Sept →
anubis13–10.0313%22 Sept →
ancient7–130.0213%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.0111%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0117%19 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0916%19 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0014%18 Sept →
anubis13–60.0420%18 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0024%17 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0416%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.037%17 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0619%14 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0311%14 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0621%14 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.048%13 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0621%13 Sept →
inferno13–20.0421%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0416%12 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0211%12 Sept →
anubis13–50.0212%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0423%27 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0220%27 Aug →
mirage13–110.0120%26 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0518%24 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0321%24 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0124%24 Aug →
dust211–130.0223%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0114%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0118%23 Aug →
ancient13–80.0126%21 Aug →
dust213–5-0.039%20 Aug →
mirage13–90.0616%20 Aug →
ancient13–80.0823%19 Aug →
ancient7–130.0525%19 Aug →
ancient13–30.105%19 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0118%17 Aug →
ancient9–130.0028%17 Aug →
dust219–17-0.0011%16 Aug →
cache13–80.0418%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0614%14 Aug →
dust216–140.0517%14 Aug →
ancient5–130.0412%14 Aug →
anubis13–60.118%13 Aug →
inferno8–130.1020%13 Aug →
ancient15–150.0115%10 Aug →
anubis9–130.0110%10 Aug →
inferno13–110.029%8 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0813%7 Aug →
dust213–60.028%7 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.1015%7 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0114%3 Aug →
dust213–6-0.048%3 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0612%3 Aug →
anubis13–100.0912%1 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0713%1 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0510%1 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0220%30 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0210%25 Jul →
office12–120.0423%25 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0622%24 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0424%24 Jul →
inferno13–80.0221%23 Jul →
cache13–110.0422%23 Jul →
cache11–130.0315%21 Jul →
ancient7–130.0838%21 Jul →
nuke9–130.0118%19 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.069%17 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.