Kirby

Kirby — CS2 Stats

76561198081958006[U:1:121692278]Steam profile ↗

471Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,982Blue band · top ~33.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22285 of 34275 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,982Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,982
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,018 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKirbyPREMIER13,982 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning44
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateTLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.6
Utility5.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time519ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–5
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB22101245%-0.00
infernoB168850%-0.01
nukeA159660%0.03
ancientC135838%-0.01
mirageA127558%0.00
dust2D93633%0.02
anubis43175%0.02
train42250%-0.05
overpass31233%0.01
office21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
38%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
89.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
518msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
10.00HE damage / grenade
7.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.0831%27 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0423%24 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0613%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0222%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0415%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0223%22 Aug
cache13–100.0718%22 Aug
anubis13–90.0727%22 Aug
dust213–80.0219%21 Aug
train13–9-0.0630%20 Aug
nuke13–10.0416%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0519%13 Aug
dust210–130.0421%13 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0135%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0215%11 Aug
cache13–9-0.0422%11 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0423%11 Aug
mirage7–130.0524%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0612%10 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0315%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0315%8 Aug
inferno13–50.0030%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0222%7 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0223%7 Aug
ancient6–130.0225%7 Aug
dust213–80.0427%7 Aug
cache1–13-0.0437%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0333%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.1026%5 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0233%4 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0533%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0421%2 Aug
cache13–110.0730%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0124%2 Aug
ancient13–3-0.037%1 Aug
inferno13–30.0125%1 Aug
ancient13–10.0719%1 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0622%1 Aug
nuke13–80.1024%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0331%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0429%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0419%30 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0128%28 Jul
anubis13–70.0225%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0424%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0219%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.0013%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0215%23 Jul
cache12–12-0.0319%21 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0119%19 Jul
nuke13–80.0524%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0515%18 Jul
cache13–90.0526%17 Jul
cache13–20.1164%16 Jul
ancient13–5-0.014%16 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0619%14 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0615%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0623%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0224%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0421%13 Jul
nuke16–140.0621%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0822%12 Jul
cache10–130.0231%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0616%12 Jul
cache15–150.0522%10 Jul
cache13–70.0732%10 Jul
dust29–130.0330%10 Jul
office13–110.0156%9 Jul
office8–130.0526%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0224%8 Jul
overpass11–130.0522%4 Jul
inferno13–20.0818%2 Jul
nuke13–50.0261%2 Jul
nuke13–50.1944%2 Jul
cache13–5-0.0237%1 Jul
cache13–60.0423%1 Jul
dust210–130.0522%30 Jun
dust28–130.0132%30 Jun
cache13–110.0435%29 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0631%27 Jun
overpass16–140.0112%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0627%20 Jun
nuke13–110.0536%19 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0218%19 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0313%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0923%19 Jun
ancient9–130.0126%19 Jun
mirage6–130.0026%19 Jun
nuke10–130.0227%18 Jun
nuke13–80.0124%18 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0334%18 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0823%18 Jun
train13–7-0.1029%18 Jun
train10–130.0250%17 Jun
train12–12-0.0644%17 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0429%17 Jun
dust28–13-0.0334%17 Jun
anubis13–90.0523%15 Jun
ancient13–80.0631%14 Jun
dust215–150.0520%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →