Carsten — CS2 Stats

DE76561198080795210[U:1:120529482]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

456Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,686Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#60190 of 258903 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,005 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Aug 2026 (86 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,686 +8,156 23 Apr – 5 Aug · 25 days played

21,797Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,005Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

43Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,005
Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 46 to go
Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,686
+6,686 over 30 days · improving
+6,687 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,314 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning54

Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–49–7Last 10044%Win rateLWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 412ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 444ms

Last 20

17–3 · 85% win rate
Avg rating 0.07
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 451ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.3

Utility2.4

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch1.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning5.4

Utility2.4

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.06

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time510ms−149ms

first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%+7.0%

first ⅓ avg 8.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 26 Jul →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 29 Jul →

359msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · dust2, 31 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak

5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 16officeWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	-0.02
anubis	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
dust2	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.01
cache	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.02
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
office	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.02
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
ancient	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
italy	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.22
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches

59%Win rate

0.85Avg K/D

75.5ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	6	67%	1.26	19.5
Anubis	6	33%	0.80	15.3
Dust2	6	50%	0.71	12.8
Inferno	6	67%	0.73	11.7
Mirage	4	50%	0.57	9.5
Overpass	2	50%	1.00	14.0
Cache	2	100%	0.76	14.0
Ancient	1	100%	0.63	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy

46.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

5.4°Preaim

480msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

49.9%CT opening success

0.19Enemies flashed / flash

0.4%Flash assists

15.35HE damage / grenade

1.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1917 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.6904% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	0.02	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	24%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.10	21%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	19%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.04	12%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.08	6%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	20%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	8%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.12	42%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.03	12%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.13	12%	28 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.03	5%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.13	14%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	23%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	13%	28 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.01	4%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.12	11%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.22	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.19	11%	26 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	13%	11 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	24%	11 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.06	21%	11 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.02	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	20%	10 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	22%	30 Jun →
anubis	0–13	-0.10	38%	29 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	0%	25 Jun →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	7%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	9%	25 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	10%	24 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	19%	24 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	6%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.01	4%	22 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	2%	22 Jun →
train	12–12	-0.07	7%	19 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	9%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	12%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	7%	13 Jun →
office	7–13	-0.01	11%	10 Jun →
alpine	13–8	0.05	13%	10 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.04	10%	10 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	14%	8 Jun →
overpass	13–9	-0.02	18%	8 Jun →
italy	13–2	0.03	6%	7 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.05	13%	6 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.02	5%	4 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	13%	4 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	24%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.02	12%	2 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	7%	2 Jun →
poseidon	2–9	-0.22	0%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	11%	31 May →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	4%	31 May →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	11%	31 May →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	14%	30 May →
anubis	13–4	0.08	1%	23 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	21%	16 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	14%	15 May →
office	6–13	-0.08	11%	14 May →
office	1–13	0.01	9%	14 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	29%	14 May →
cache	5–13	-0.02	10%	14 May →
office	1–13	-0.12	4%	14 May →
overpass	3–13	-0.04	9%	14 May →
office	13–7	0.03	6%	13 May →
overpass	4–13	-0.08	8%	13 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.10	3%	13 May →
overpass	11–4	-0.01	12%	12 May →
anubis	13–5	0.01	17%	12 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	10%	11 May →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	4%	11 May →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	15%	11 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	15%	10 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	10%	9 May →
cache	13–9	0.00	11%	9 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.08	8%	7 May →
cache	9–13	-0.07	10%	7 May →
cache	10–13	-0.07	5%	3 May →
cache	5–13	-0.00	16%	3 May →
italy	13–11	-0.03	1%	2 May →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	6%	2 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	6%	1 May →
warden	0–3	-0.10	0%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.07	9%	29 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.10	0%	29 Apr →
inferno	12–12	-0.09	2%	29 Apr →
cache	9–13	-0.06	8%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.01	13%	29 Apr →
office	12–12	-0.01	8%	28 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	10%	28 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	8%	27 Apr →
overpass	10–13	0.02	8%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.03	7%	24 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	13%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	10%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	5%	23 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	10%	22 Apr →
overpass	4–13	-0.01	12%	22 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	9%	16 Apr →