Hooplah

Hooplah — CS2 Stats

76561198080008695[U:1:119742967]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,206Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating28,600Top 1% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1600 of 238779 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,600 +2,514 27 Jul21 Sept · 28 days played
26,04329,151peak 29,15127 Jul21 Sept
29,151Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 551 below peak (29,151)
  • +1,008 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1,400 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHooplahFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,600 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateWLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +10.3pp headshot accuracy · +97ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.1
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time544ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy31.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 31.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · office, 7 Sept
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 2 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 6–1 · cache, 12 Sept
13–0Biggest win · italy, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%0.01
dust2A2113862%-0.01
anubisD124833%0.00
cacheS129375%0.02
infernoC94544%-0.00
nukeS96367%0.01
ancientD72529%0.01
boulder110100%0.04
italy110100%0.09
office110100%0.19
shelter1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,667Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
77.1ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage54052%1.1115.9
Anubis33449%1.0715.8
Dust228455%1.0916.4
Inferno16646%1.1417.4
Vertigo16445%1.1216.9
Ancient14052%1.1416.5
Nuke8744%1.0916.3
Overpass3941%1.0115.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
568msReaction time
50.5%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.78HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.3214% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0727%21 Sept
dust25–13-0.1339%21 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0341%21 Sept
ancient13–60.1543%21 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0516%19 Sept
inferno7–130.0331%19 Sept
nuke13–30.0544%12 Sept
boulder13–70.0437%12 Sept
italy13–00.0950%12 Sept
cache13–80.0523%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.0726%12 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0315%12 Sept
cache13–9-0.0330%12 Sept
cache6–1-0.0322%12 Sept
anubis15–150.0632%11 Sept
dust20–13-0.210%11 Sept
nuke13–80.0337%11 Sept
nuke7–130.0637%10 Sept
ancient5–90.0419%9 Sept
mirage13–60.0231%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0338%9 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0222%9 Sept
cache13–8-0.0423%9 Sept
nuke13–110.0523%8 Sept
office13–80.1950%7 Sept
ancient6–130.0129%6 Sept
inferno13–50.0346%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0234%6 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0636%2 Sept
anubis10–130.0128%2 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0264%2 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0324%2 Sept
mirage15–150.0932%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0538%29 Aug
dust213–90.0136%29 Aug
inferno8–130.0221%24 Aug
mirage13–2-0.060%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0123%24 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0733%23 Aug
dust213–60.0325%23 Aug
cache7–13-0.0018%23 Aug
mirage13–30.1741%23 Aug
cache13–5-0.0117%23 Aug
dust22–13-0.0443%23 Aug
ancient6–130.0028%22 Aug
cache9–130.1130%22 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0633%20 Aug
dust213–30.0227%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0024%20 Aug
anubis7–130.0433%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0633%18 Aug
dust213–80.0327%18 Aug
cache13–60.0534%18 Aug
shelter12–120.0033%16 Aug
cache0–13-0.0633%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0141%16 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0643%16 Aug
cache13–60.0835%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0433%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0022%16 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0633%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0024%16 Aug
dust213–80.0642%16 Aug
dust26–130.0025%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0730%15 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0131%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0432%15 Aug
inferno13–80.0231%13 Aug
ancient13–40.0025%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0227%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0624%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0029%11 Aug
mirage16–140.0633%11 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0529%11 Aug
anubis13–60.0630%11 Aug
dust215–150.0936%11 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0518%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0150%7 Aug
nuke6–130.0333%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.1054%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0323%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0439%3 Aug
anubis13–80.0926%3 Aug
anubis8–130.0323%2 Aug
dust216–120.1032%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.0715%1 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0143%1 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0425%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0821%1 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0517%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0514%30 Jul
mirage9–130.0441%30 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0126%30 Jul
dust216–120.0843%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0136%29 Jul
dust213–50.0222%29 Jul
cache13–90.0736%28 Jul
cache13–90.0230%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0128%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0323%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →