V1KING

V1KING — CS2 Stats

SE76561198079956935[U:1:119691207]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

557Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 557 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,781 +13,424 27 Mar – 6 Jun · 16 days played
8,35721,983peak 21,98327 Mar6 Jun
21,996Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-03-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGV1KINGFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY70–26–4Last 10070%Win rateWWTWLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact8.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time537ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 4 Apr →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 10 Apr →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 16 May →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 17 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 84% over 19dust2Weakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS1916–384%0.07
ancientA1710–759%0.02
infernoS1410–471%0.06
anubisS1310–377%0.03
cacheS97–278%0.03
overpassS96–367%0.04
dust2B63–350%0.06
vertigo—21–150%0.06
poseidon—21–150%0.10
alpine—21–150%-0.08
nuke—11–0100%0.06
fachwerk—10–10%0.00
debris—11–0100%0.08
eldorado—11–0100%0.03
italy—11–0100%0.03
stronghold—11–0100%0.06
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

969Matches
52%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
79.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8149%1.1116.7
Anubis3563%1.3517.0
Ancient3453%1.1217.4
Inferno2536%1.1316.4
Overpass1225%1.1816.3
Train20%1.1220.5
Nuke1100%1.5614.0
Vertigo10%1.5323.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.6%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
509msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
6.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4022% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0615%28 Aug →
cache13–110.0822%28 Aug →
overpass12–120.0721%28 Aug →
vertigo13–50.1214%21 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0119%21 Aug →
cache13–80.0615%21 Aug →
inferno12–120.0119%13 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0410%1 Aug →
inferno10–130.0115%1 Aug →
mirage13–60.038%1 Aug →
anubis13–110.0012%1 Aug →
dust24–9-0.030%17 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0138%17 Jul →
mirage12–160.0422%17 Jul →
cache13–90.0319%10 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0354%10 Jul →
fachwerk5–130.0023%10 Jul →
debris9–40.0828%10 Jul →
eldorado9–50.0322%10 Jul →
cache13–80.0216%9 Jul →
poseidon8–8-0.0318%30 Jun →
poseidon9–20.2224%25 Jun →
cache5–130.0321%25 Jun →
alpine1–13-0.0929%25 Jun →
italy13–70.0342%25 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0115%6 Jun →
ancient12–160.0317%6 Jun →
anubis16–130.0128%6 Jun →
ancient13–50.0518%6 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0320%23 May →
overpass15–150.0321%23 May →
inferno13–50.0710%23 May →
ancient13–20.0550%23 May →
anubis7–13-0.034%23 May →
dust24–13-0.0341%18 May →
ancient5–13-0.0810%18 May →
anubis13–6-0.047%18 May →
overpass7–13-0.0126%18 May →
inferno13–50.0318%16 May →
mirage13–20.0911%16 May →
anubis13–60.0114%16 May →
ancient13–60.0716%16 May →
inferno13–70.0232%15 May →
cache13–7-0.0614%13 May →
mirage13–10.1017%13 May →
mirage13–50.0513%13 May →
inferno6–13-0.0315%13 May →
dust27–130.0234%13 May →
ancient8–130.0129%13 May →
inferno13–90.1133%13 May →
ancient13–6-0.0124%13 May →
mirage13–30.1621%13 May →
overpass13–50.0920%12 May →
mirage5–13-0.0435%12 May →
inferno13–50.1127%12 May →
inferno13–40.1022%12 May →
dust213–20.1723%12 May →
dust213–80.1131%12 May →
ancient13–90.1330%12 May →
mirage13–20.0139%12 May →
overpass9–30.0428%12 May →
cache13–80.0322%10 May →
anubis13–60.0617%10 May →
mirage13–30.1620%10 May →
overpass13–9-0.0528%1 May →
cache5–50.0739%1 May →
cache13–100.0250%1 May →
anubis13–40.1221%27 Apr →
overpass16–120.1229%27 Apr →
ancient7–00.0212%27 Apr →
mirage13–10.0536%17 Apr →
anubis13–00.1026%17 Apr →
mirage13–100.0923%11 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.026%11 Apr →
anubis13–10.1722%11 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0216%11 Apr →
mirage16–120.0322%10 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0222%10 Apr →
mirage13–20.0558%10 Apr →
inferno13–70.1418%10 Apr →
ancient13–70.0019%10 Apr →
mirage13–80.0313%7 Apr →
overpass13–70.0926%4 Apr →
inferno13–90.1332%4 Apr →
mirage13–100.2527%4 Apr →
mirage12–20.1318%4 Apr →
mirage13–80.1628%4 Apr →
ancient13–20.1314%30 Mar →
dust213–00.1119%30 Mar →
inferno6–130.0122%30 Mar →
anubis13–90.1322%30 Mar →
inferno13–50.1931%30 Mar →
ancient10–30.1624%30 Mar →
stronghold13–80.0630%28 Mar →
train5–13-0.0246%28 Mar →
vertigo8–10-0.018%28 Mar →
alpine13–9-0.0730%28 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.074%27 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0418%27 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0319%27 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.