Pineapples

Pineapples — CS2 Stats

GB76561198079584688[U:1:119318960]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

63Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,223Purple band · top ~27.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33125 of 56053 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPineapplesPREMIER15,223 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning54
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY25204Last 4951%Win rateWLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.2
Utility1.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.4
Utility1.8
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time601ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+7.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 49 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — vertigo
5Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB126650%0.01
mirageS98189%0.03
dust2A95456%-0.01
anubisD61517%-0.01
ancientC52340%0.01
overpass31233%-0.02
train2020%-0.04
nuke21150%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.09

Across the last 49 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

81Matches
63%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
620msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.94HE damage / grenade
6.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4542% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0112%2 Feb
anubis4–130.0144%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.1311%15 Jul
inferno13–110.0531%15 Jul
ancient13–100.0320%15 Jul
dust214–160.0232%14 Jul
anubis11–130.0127%14 Jul
dust213–60.0233%14 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0122%14 Jul
ancient9–130.0630%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0534%12 Jul
vertigo13–00.0936%12 Jul
mirage5–50.0327%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.057%10 Jul
overpass10–13-0.0112%10 Jul
mirage12–40.0618%10 Jul
anubis12–120.0116%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0222%6 Jul
dust213–6-0.0616%6 Jul
ancient13–80.0019%6 Jul
inferno13–90.0813%5 Jul
overpass13–30.0118%5 Jul
train9–13-0.048%5 Jul
mirage13–20.1129%4 Jul
train8–13-0.0432%1 Jul
mirage13–30.0138%1 Jul
inferno13–110.0411%1 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0519%1 Jul
dust216–130.0119%28 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0123%24 Jun
dust213–40.0426%23 Jun
dust27–130.0113%17 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0217%16 Jun
nuke13–50.0218%15 Jun
mirage13–90.0013%19 Nov
anubis4–13-0.0411%11 Nov
inferno11–130.0328%11 Nov
anubis13–30.0313%10 Nov
inferno12–12-0.0314%10 Nov
inferno13–00.0528%28 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0325%28 Sept
mirage13–00.1026%28 Sept
mirage16–10-0.0225%14 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0218%2 Sept
overpass12–16-0.067%20 Apr
nuke8–16-0.089%30 Mar
mirage15–15-0.038%27 Mar
inferno13–16-0.029%27 Mar
dust29–50.0217%25 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →