Ka10pi

Ka10pi — CS2 Stats

76561198079363938[U:1:119098210]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,833Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,729Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78582 of 222713 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,729 +3,966 31 May14 Sept · 32 days played
15,39420,402peak 20,40231 May14 Sept
20,402Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 673 below peak (20,402)
  • -270 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,884 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 271 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKa10piFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,729 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning46
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.2

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time672ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 672ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 28.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–4 · eldorado, 18 Jul
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · ancient, 14 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · cache, 11 Jul
13–1Biggest win · cache, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32141844%-0.02
ancientB158753%-0.02
nukeA138562%-0.00
cacheA116555%-0.02
infernoC104640%-0.03
anubisB84450%-0.00
dust232167%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.02
boulder1010%-0.04
fachwerk110100%-0.06
shelter110100%-0.08
poseidon1010%0.05
eldorado110100%0.10
debris1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

237Matches
55%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
71.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5357%0.9014.1
Ancient2864%0.9515.4
Inferno2741%0.7512.6
Anubis2446%0.7112.3
Cache1145%1.0115.6
Nuke1040%0.8815.2
Dust2875%0.9214.5
Train475%0.8811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
675msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
4.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0671% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–130.0327%14 Sept
mirage7–130.0433%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0223%4 Sept
cache13–1-0.0525%4 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0226%26 Aug
nuke10–130.0218%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0614%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0422%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0810%22 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0019%17 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0222%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0445%16 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0128%14 Aug
mirage13–30.0225%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0220%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0718%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0237%13 Aug
mirage4–1-0.0133%13 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0114%12 Aug
nuke13–20.0413%12 Aug
cache10–13-0.0829%11 Aug
mirage13–110.0216%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1343%6 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0225%5 Aug
cache13–10-0.0339%5 Aug
boulder10–13-0.0424%25 Jul
fachwerk5–7-0.0620%25 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0820%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0630%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0329%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0427%19 Jul
anubis12–160.0012%19 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0628%18 Jul
poseidon8–80.0524%18 Jul
eldorado9–40.1033%18 Jul
debris8–8-0.0616%18 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0519%17 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0418%17 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0023%17 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0218%16 Jul
anubis16–120.0324%16 Jul
cache13–11-0.0536%16 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0730%16 Jul
ancient13–30.0235%16 Jul
nuke13–70.0120%16 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0132%16 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0022%14 Jul
cache13–4-0.0638%14 Jul
cache13–6-0.0214%14 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0423%14 Jul
ancient4–00.0267%14 Jul
cache7–130.0131%14 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0114%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0234%14 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0425%13 Jul
mirage6–130.0330%12 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0325%12 Jul
ancient6–0-0.0136%12 Jul
cache13–80.0333%12 Jul
cache13–160.0520%12 Jul
mirage13–20.0729%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0224%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0922%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0222%11 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0125%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0534%11 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0224%11 Jul
dust213–100.0033%4 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0131%30 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0333%26 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0325%26 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0818%21 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0225%21 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0035%21 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0431%21 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0032%21 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0631%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0820%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0532%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0819%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0428%19 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0639%19 Jun
overpass0–7-0.0333%17 Jun
inferno13–100.0215%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0729%15 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0912%14 Jun
nuke13–70.0333%14 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0653%13 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0144%13 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0222%7 Jun
mirage9–130.0118%7 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0230%6 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0826%5 Jun
ancient13–50.0630%5 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0319%3 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0234%3 Jun
ancient16–140.0332%3 Jun
nuke15–150.0236%31 May
nuke8–13-0.0124%31 May
cache7–130.0126%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →