fenz

fenz — CS2 Stats

SD76561198078866378[U:1:118600650]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,070Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,682 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfenzFACEITLevel 10 · 1,682 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression7.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time572ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 9–13
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
814In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 78% over 27infernoWeakest map · 13% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2721678%-0.00
dust2A1911858%0.01
infernoD1521313%0.01
ancientC146843%-0.01
nukeB105550%-0.00
anubisA95456%0.01
overpass3030%-0.02
cache21150%0.01
warden1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,904Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
83.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25853%1.0916.6
Dust222649%1.0817.0
Ancient12945%1.0116.5
Anubis10452%1.0016.4
Inferno10350%1.0415.8
Nuke8848%1.0015.4
Overpass3741%0.9615.3
Cache3060%1.0815.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
566msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
6.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0313%28 Aug
dust213–110.0225%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0417%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.0330%7 Aug
nuke12–160.0017%7 Aug
dust217–190.0633%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0428%1 Aug
cache4–130.0122%31 Jul
dust213–20.0237%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0028%26 Jul
anubis9–130.1820%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0321%24 Jul
nuke13–100.0415%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0318%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0216%9 Jul
dust216–14-0.0418%8 Jul
dust213–90.0125%8 Jul
mirage11–130.0115%3 Jul
mirage13–6-0.028%3 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0231%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0018%1 Jul
dust28–13-0.0315%27 Jun
mirage13–40.0229%27 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0333%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0721%27 Jun
ancient7–130.0016%25 Jun
dust211–130.0225%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0418%25 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0110%25 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0711%24 Jun
mirage13–160.0033%24 Jun
inferno6–13-0.019%19 Jun
mirage13–30.0415%13 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0222%13 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0520%12 Jun
dust213–11-0.0225%10 Jun
ancient13–110.0322%10 Jun
mirage13–100.0312%4 Jun
dust25–130.0222%4 Jun
inferno10–130.0021%2 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0323%28 May
inferno11–130.0613%20 May
anubis13–80.036%20 May
inferno2–13-0.1029%15 May
nuke8–13-0.0426%15 May
cache16–130.0110%15 May
mirage13–11-0.0121%15 May
nuke11–130.0120%13 May
mirage8–13-0.0318%9 May
inferno6–130.0013%8 May
dust216–140.0317%8 May
ancient13–90.0512%8 May
ancient13–80.0410%1 May
dust213–16-0.0226%30 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0414%29 Apr
inferno5–130.0321%24 Apr
inferno13–20.0914%24 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0712%24 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0414%23 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0133%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0321%23 Apr
ancient13–100.0024%23 Apr
mirage13–60.0111%23 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0123%23 Apr
nuke13–70.0020%23 Apr
mirage13–30.058%23 Apr
inferno9–130.0821%21 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0818%17 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0424%9 Apr
dust213–70.0327%9 Apr
ancient17–19-0.0411%8 Apr
dust213–40.0314%8 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0427%7 Apr
nuke13–100.0436%7 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0814%3 Apr
overpass11–130.0017%1 Apr
mirage13–50.0211%1 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0221%1 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0014%31 Mar
mirage13–90.0220%31 Mar
inferno10–130.0321%31 Mar
anubis22–18-0.0219%28 Mar
dust22–13-0.0215%27 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0016%27 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0319%24 Mar
inferno14–160.0419%24 Mar
warden5–13-0.0114%21 Mar
dust210–130.0423%20 Mar
dust213–40.0925%20 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0124%20 Mar
mirage16–120.0213%13 Mar
mirage13–40.1026%13 Mar
dust213–100.0615%7 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0525%6 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0614%6 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0320%5 Mar
ancient13–50.0524%3 Mar
anubis9–130.0226%3 Mar
anubis13–6-0.044%3 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0125%24 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →