Hackett

Hackett — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198078450523[U:1:118184795]Steam profile ↗

2,243Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,843 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHackettFACEITLevel 9 · 1,843 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateLWLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression7.6
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time587ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–9
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA35201557%0.03
dust2A2112957%0.01
infernoA116555%0.02
nukeS96367%0.00
cacheS65183%0.02
anubisD62433%-0.01
overpassS54180%-0.03
ancient31233%-0.02
office2020%0.04
train1010%-0.02
vertigo110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,859Matches
49%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
78.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22952%0.9414.6
Dust210752%0.9214.1
Anubis6648%0.9414.8
Ancient5953%0.9113.9
Inferno5042%0.8914.5
Nuke4156%0.8513.9
Vertigo2638%0.8915.3
Cache683%0.8213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
583msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.66HE damage / grenade
8.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7772% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache14–160.0311%16 Aug
mirage13–00.1325%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0229%13 Aug
train7–13-0.0222%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0522%26 Jul
mirage6–130.0320%22 Jul
dust213–40.0117%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0119%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0218%8 Jul
nuke10–13-0.044%8 Jul
cache13–6-0.0116%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0115%3 Jul
dust213–20.1124%3 Jul
anubis8–130.0222%2 Jul
mirage3–130.0418%2 Jul
nuke13–20.059%2 Jul
inferno13–70.0422%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0039%1 Jul
mirage15–150.0220%30 Jun
dust29–13-0.0210%30 Jun
inferno13–100.026%28 Jun
mirage13–100.1023%28 Jun
dust213–90.0924%27 Jun
inferno13–70.0320%27 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0114%27 Jun
dust213–6-0.0624%27 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0613%23 Jun
mirage13–50.059%23 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0014%11 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0119%8 Jun
inferno12–120.017%8 Jun
vertigo7–3-0.0331%8 Jun
anubis9–130.014%6 Jun
mirage6–130.0113%6 Jun
office10–130.0118%4 Jun
cache13–30.0618%30 May
inferno11–130.0520%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0110%11 May
dust213–110.0228%10 May
cache13–9-0.0011%10 May
nuke9–130.0421%9 May
dust28–13-0.0620%9 May
inferno11–130.0010%3 May
cache19–17-0.0512%2 May
nuke13–20.0911%2 May
cache13–40.0724%2 May
mirage13–00.1013%2 May
mirage16–130.0618%26 Apr
mirage8–130.0520%26 Apr
dust27–13-0.0217%25 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0211%25 Apr
dust213–11-0.0215%25 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0513%25 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0914%19 Apr
dust213–6-0.0231%19 Apr
dust210–13-0.0123%19 Apr
anubis2–130.0017%16 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0625%16 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0527%15 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0419%15 Apr
mirage13–90.1630%15 Apr
dust213–70.0213%13 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0031%12 Apr
mirage13–60.1119%12 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0014%12 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0612%11 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0110%11 Apr
dust28–130.019%8 Apr
dust211–13-0.0320%8 Apr
mirage13–60.0316%8 Apr
overpass10–3-0.0615%8 Apr
dust213–6-0.0326%8 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0119%8 Apr
mirage13–110.0214%7 Apr
dust213–80.0023%7 Apr
mirage13–20.0420%7 Apr
nuke13–60.0233%7 Apr
overpass13–10-0.036%6 Apr
mirage11–130.0520%4 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0428%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0218%4 Apr
mirage13–40.0430%4 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0316%4 Apr
dust29–130.0218%4 Apr
mirage13–110.1124%4 Apr
inferno13–70.0821%4 Apr
ancient13–110.0425%3 Apr
inferno7–130.0114%3 Apr
mirage13–50.1119%3 Apr
mirage13–10.0218%3 Apr
nuke13–10-0.014%3 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0117%3 Apr
dust28–130.1224%3 Apr
mirage7–130.0524%26 Mar
office10–130.0720%26 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0417%26 Mar
dust213–11-0.0316%26 Mar
dust213–60.0619%23 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0711%23 Mar
dust27–13-0.0123%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →