Skruffe

Skruffe — CS2 Stats

76561198078019025[U:1:117753297]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,832Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,700Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14340 of 239295 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,672 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 13 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,700 -76 13 Jun22 Sept · 27 days played
23,33625,844peak 25,84413 Jun22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,672 +0 3 Sept13 Sept · 2 observations
1,6721,672peak 1,6723 Sept13 Sept
26,209Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,672Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,672
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 79 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 144 below peak (25,844)
  • +520 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,337 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,300 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSkruffeFACEITLevel 8 · 1,672 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,700 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,672csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning56
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45478Last 10045%Win rateWLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −9.5pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.6
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.1

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · cache, 10 Sept
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 26infernoWeakest map · 20% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%0.01
infernoD2041620%-0.00
ancientB179853%-0.01
cacheB147750%0.01
anubisB105550%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.04
dust2C52340%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
58%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1173%0.9612.6
Ancient9100%0.8812.3
Inferno956%1.0814.9
Anubis875%1.1915.9
Dust2367%0.8810.7
Nuke1100%1.6016.0
Cache10%0.9212.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
50.8%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
13.00HE damage / grenade
17.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.2135% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–120.0417%22 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0118%22 Sept
cache11–13-0.0012%11 Sept
anubis8–130.0331%11 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0329%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0435%11 Sept
cache13–110.0418%10 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0417%10 Sept
ancient13–100.0418%10 Sept
anubis13–70.0219%10 Sept
cache2–00.01100%10 Sept
mirage13–70.0644%10 Sept
ancient13–70.0228%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0427%9 Sept
anubis13–100.0514%9 Sept
mirage11–130.0616%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0324%7 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0113%3 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0122%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0321%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0628%2 Sept
anubis15–150.0516%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0333%1 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0423%1 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0418%1 Sept
dust216–14-0.0119%1 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0117%1 Sept
ancient13–10.076%31 Aug
mirage13–100.0319%31 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0333%31 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0320%31 Aug
mirage7–130.0021%31 Aug
mirage13–50.0620%30 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0722%30 Aug
cache13–80.1027%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0317%29 Aug
inferno13–70.037%29 Aug
anubis13–60.0315%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0120%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0412%29 Aug
inferno8–130.0213%29 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0722%29 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0221%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0416%28 Aug
cache11–13-0.038%27 Aug
ancient13–70.1016%27 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0113%27 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0517%26 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0623%26 Aug
cache13–70.0918%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0219%25 Aug
cache10–130.0119%25 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0217%25 Aug
inferno15–150.0822%24 Aug
ancient13–80.0229%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0018%24 Aug
dust26–130.0018%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0530%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0129%19 Aug
nuke0–13-0.1011%19 Aug
nuke16–140.0133%18 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0016%18 Aug
anubis13–30.2022%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0020%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0324%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0332%14 Aug
mirage13–60.1135%14 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0022%13 Aug
cache13–10-0.0015%8 Aug
anubis10–130.0129%8 Aug
cache3–13-0.059%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0515%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0121%2 Aug
cache11–130.0121%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.028%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0216%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0423%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0022%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0246%15 Jul
inferno13–30.1217%15 Jul
ancient13–6-0.1027%15 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0610%10 Jul
mirage16–140.0235%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0624%25 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0326%25 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0519%22 Jun
mirage10–130.0625%22 Jun
mirage15–150.0526%21 Jun
vertigo9–130.0720%21 Jun
inferno7–130.0321%18 Jun
ancient6–13-0.066%18 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0812%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0618%14 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0027%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0022%13 Jun
anubis13–60.0015%13 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0124%13 Jun
ancient13–90.0724%13 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0010%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →