€nRag3

€nRag3 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198076654788[U:1:116389060]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,080Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,283Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52602 of 258953 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,707 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,283 +335 15 May – 26 Oct · 24 days played
20,60423,975peak 23,97515 May26 Oct
24,301Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,707Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,707
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,692 below peak (23,975)
  • -1,337 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,717 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG€nRag3FACEITLevel 8 · 1,707 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,283 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,707csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time535ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 29 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 17 May →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 30 Aug →
13–4Biggest win · nuke, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
13–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 15cacheWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%0.02
dust2C207–1335%-0.01
ancientC177–1041%0.03
mirageS1510–567%0.03
cacheD134–931%-0.02
nukeB63–350%0.04
anubisD62–433%-0.03
overpass—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,412Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
70.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11945%0.9914.0
Ancient10847%1.0214.7
Mirage9558%1.0415.1
Dust26542%0.9615.2
Cache3658%0.9613.5
Anubis3139%0.9813.9
Nuke2361%0.9414.1
Overpass2241%0.9814.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
534msReaction time
50.9%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.48HE damage / grenade
8.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.9906% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0516%26 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0120%25 Oct →
mirage8–130.0818%21 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0539%21 Oct →
ancient9–20.1036%21 Oct →
mirage13–100.0822%18 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0720%18 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0828%15 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0733%15 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0421%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.0526%12 Oct →
inferno7–130.0024%12 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0016%12 Oct →
ancient9–130.0117%29 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0023%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.1724%29 Sept →
ancient15–150.0719%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0316%27 Sept →
dust28–130.0624%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0115%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.0713%21 Sept →
inferno13–110.0735%18 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0219%18 Sept →
ancient6–130.0526%15 Sept →
inferno13–60.1023%15 Sept →
nuke17–190.0316%14 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0026%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0415%13 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0222%8 Sept →
mirage13–100.0413%7 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0732%31 Aug →
inferno5–130.0920%31 Aug →
dust213–60.1026%31 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0215%31 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0524%31 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0131%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0018%30 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0218%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0231%13 Aug →
ancient13–80.0419%9 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0019%9 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0619%6 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0623%2 Aug →
mirage9–130.0926%31 Jul →
cache10–130.0221%31 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0618%26 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0320%25 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0115%25 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0412%25 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0217%25 Jul →
inferno9–70.0220%25 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0111%24 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0626%23 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0829%18 Jul →
ancient13–70.0122%18 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0323%18 Jul →
ancient13–60.0216%17 Jul →
mirage13–50.0726%17 Jul →
ancient13–60.0621%13 Jul →
cache13–60.0612%13 Jul →
inferno13–110.0413%12 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0519%12 Jul →
dust213–90.1215%4 Jul →
ancient9–130.0132%3 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0615%13 Jun →
dust213–110.0217%13 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0714%12 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0315%12 Jun →
overpass9–130.0510%12 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0329%12 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0327%12 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0328%8 Jun →
dust215–15-0.0317%8 Jun →
dust29–130.0016%3 Jun →
mirage16–12-0.037%3 Jun →
nuke13–100.0323%3 Jun →
dust25–130.0121%2 Jun →
inferno16–140.1018%2 Jun →
ancient6–130.0818%30 May →
nuke13–110.1315%30 May →
ancient9–130.0119%30 May →
inferno13–80.0117%30 May →
anubis13–80.0219%29 May →
inferno6–13-0.0112%29 May →
dust213–11-0.0119%25 May →
nuke7–130.0417%25 May →
ancient9–130.0618%17 May →
mirage13–40.0921%17 May →
cache13–11-0.0010%17 May →
anubis6–13-0.1013%17 May →
mirage5–13-0.0554%17 May →
mirage10–13-0.0322%16 May →
ancient13–60.0233%16 May →
mirage16–140.0719%15 May →
ancient14–16-0.0318%15 May →
cache6–13-0.0214%15 May →
inferno15–15-0.0523%15 May →
inferno13–50.0618%15 May →
inferno11–130.0527%15 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.