ICEDT3A

ICEDT3A — CS2 Stats

76561198075440533[U:1:115174805]Steam profile ↗

851Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,188Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4109 of 15856 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,650 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGICEDT3AFACEITLevel 9 · 1,650 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,188 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning55
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression6.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time523ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25131252%0.01
mirageA2011955%0.04
cacheB1991047%0.01
infernoC146843%0.02
nukeC94544%0.04
ancientA85363%0.03
anubisS54180%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

961Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4553%1.0016.5
Dust23754%1.2219.3
Ancient3447%0.9916.9
Inferno3352%1.1017.1
Anubis1331%1.0516.1
Overpass1155%0.9813.6
Nuke850%1.1413.9
Cache367%0.8014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
510msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
11.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.442% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0616%28 Aug
nuke9–130.0320%28 Aug
dust213–50.0321%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0227%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0115%28 Aug
dust21–13-0.0926%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0622%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0417%28 Aug
dust213–90.0317%28 Aug
cache13–50.0216%27 Aug
cache13–10-0.0417%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0612%27 Aug
cache13–50.0624%27 Aug
dust215–150.0322%27 Aug
dust29–130.0123%27 Aug
dust27–130.0012%27 Aug
mirage10–130.1021%27 Aug
dust211–130.0228%27 Aug
mirage8–130.0122%27 Aug
inferno9–130.0729%27 Aug
cache15–150.0121%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0718%27 Aug
mirage9–130.0924%27 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0223%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.063%27 Aug
cache13–100.0821%27 Aug
nuke13–80.0511%27 Aug
dust22–13-0.067%27 Aug
cache13–70.0316%27 Aug
ancient14–160.0316%27 Aug
cache11–130.0116%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0519%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0231%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0417%27 Aug
anubis6–130.0423%27 Aug
anubis13–80.0115%27 Aug
dust28–130.0123%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0322%27 Aug
dust213–5-0.0226%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0528%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0116%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0123%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0317%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0326%25 Aug
mirage13–80.1030%25 Aug
nuke11–130.0313%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0120%12 Aug
cache11–130.0318%12 Aug
dust213–30.1824%12 Aug
nuke13–20.1222%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0023%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0314%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0323%12 Aug
anubis16–140.0527%11 Aug
mirage13–00.1619%11 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0519%11 Aug
inferno6–130.0331%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0320%10 Aug
dust213–60.0721%10 Aug
inferno9–130.0417%9 Aug
inferno9–130.0218%7 Aug
dust27–10.1128%7 Aug
cache12–120.0222%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0224%7 Aug
mirage13–50.0714%7 Aug
ancient13–60.0823%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0721%7 Aug
dust213–40.0119%7 Aug
mirage13–70.1326%7 Aug
cache13–110.0722%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0423%7 Aug
ancient13–80.1320%7 Aug
dust213–100.0418%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0021%7 Aug
cache8–130.0426%5 Aug
cache4–13-0.0715%5 Aug
dust212–120.0019%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0210%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0721%5 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0513%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0033%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0218%5 Aug
inferno13–60.0522%5 Aug
inferno13–110.0626%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0127%4 Aug
dust213–9-0.0139%4 Aug
dust216–140.0112%4 Aug
ancient13–160.0423%4 Aug
mirage13–40.1225%4 Aug
cache13–90.0218%4 Aug
cache6–13-0.0213%4 Aug
cache7–13-0.0330%4 Aug
dust213–8-0.0128%4 Aug
cache9–130.0029%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0824%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0729%4 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0017%4 Aug
inferno8–130.0435%4 Aug
cache13–100.1025%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0432%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →