Sikk #Oligarch

Sikk #Oligarch — CS2 Stats

DE76561198075378081[U:1:115112353]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,368Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,363Top 50% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74644 of 247942 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,368 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,363 -1,262 26 May – 30 Sept · 23 days played
20,36323,353peak 23,35326 May30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,506 +0 6 Sept – 8 Sept · 2 observations
1,5061,506peak 1,5066 Sept8 Sept
23,470Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,506Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,990 below peak (23,353)
  • -174 over 30 days · steady
  • -509 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,637 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSikk #OligarchFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,363 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,506csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning59
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–45–11Last 10044%Win rateWWWLTLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 5 Jun →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 1 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · anubis, 15 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2312–1152%-0.00
cacheD206–1430%-0.01
anubisC187–1139%0.01
ancientA127–558%-0.03
nukeB115–645%0.00
fachwerkB63–350%-0.01
overpassD51–420%-0.03
italy—11–0100%0.09
shelter—11–0100%0.02
mirage—10–10%-0.03
poseidon—10–10%0.05
alpine—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

592Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7368%1.1416.8
Ancient7154%1.1015.9
Vertigo2722%1.0515.5
Nuke2544%0.9714.3
Mirage2245%0.9714.8
Inferno1631%0.9114.1
Dust2729%0.8011.7
Train617%0.8112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
581msReaction time
42.1%T opening success
34.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.69HE damage / grenade
11.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.8779% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy13–60.0925%23 Sept →
fachwerk13–20.0116%23 Sept →
inferno16–140.0926%20 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0025%20 Sept →
inferno15–150.0522%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0231%29 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0322%29 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0017%29 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.009%28 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0113%28 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0836%28 Aug →
fachwerk8–13-0.0125%26 Aug →
fachwerk3–13-0.074%19 Aug →
fachwerk13–60.037%19 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0514%14 Aug →
inferno13–70.0722%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0315%14 Aug →
fachwerk13–7-0.0125%10 Aug →
fachwerk11–13-0.0222%8 Aug →
shelter13–80.0235%8 Aug →
inferno8–130.0221%7 Aug →
anubis13–60.0120%7 Aug →
ancient13–80.0918%7 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0521%6 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0218%4 Aug →
anubis13–110.0321%4 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0424%4 Aug →
inferno0–80.0132%4 Aug →
cache9–130.0325%4 Aug →
inferno13–90.0718%4 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0527%3 Aug →
ancient13–90.0118%3 Aug →
anubis13–80.0210%3 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0917%3 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0520%2 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1421%2 Aug →
nuke8–130.0121%2 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0422%1 Aug →
nuke5–130.0127%1 Aug →
inferno13–90.0245%1 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0125%1 Aug →
anubis13–100.0914%1 Aug →
cache13–80.0214%1 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0218%31 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.058%31 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.076%30 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.029%30 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.034%30 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0216%29 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0610%29 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0217%27 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.077%26 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0321%25 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0225%24 Jul →
nuke13–100.0416%24 Jul →
inferno13–3-0.0422%24 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0218%24 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0513%22 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0025%22 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0510%22 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0312%18 Jul →
inferno15–150.009%17 Jul →
nuke15–150.0126%16 Jul →
cache13–90.0520%15 Jul →
anubis13–10.0940%15 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0019%15 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0324%14 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0320%14 Jul →
inferno13–60.0429%14 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0415%9 Jul →
inferno13–80.0822%9 Jul →
cache12–120.0019%8 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0130%8 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0629%6 Jul →
nuke13–80.0227%6 Jul →
inferno13–80.0338%6 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0114%5 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.0510%5 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0126%24 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0611%6 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0327%6 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0720%5 Jun →
cache13–20.1128%5 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0914%30 May →
anubis4–130.0315%30 May →
alpine13–40.1041%29 May →
cache5–13-0.0519%29 May →
ancient15–15-0.0123%28 May →
overpass11–13-0.0226%28 May →
anubis8–13-0.0114%28 May →
cache9–13-0.0619%28 May →
anubis7–13-0.0123%27 May →
nuke13–30.0518%27 May →
anubis13–60.0615%27 May →
nuke13–30.0716%27 May →
overpass13–10-0.0511%27 May →
inferno13–5-0.0334%27 May →
overpass11–13-0.0215%26 May →
inferno15–15-0.0320%26 May →
ancient13–8-0.0123%26 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.