Freyja

Freyja — CS2 Stats

US76561198075068721[U:1:114802993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,793Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,970Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#76181 of 233974 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 804 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−368Premier CS Rating · 20,368 → 20,000
0Faceit ELO · 804 → 804
+3Tracked matches · now 1,793
−3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +4,739 23 Aug21 Sept · 21 days played
13,84020,368peak 20,36823 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 804 +0 29 Aug20 Sept · 3 observations
804804peak 80429 Aug20 Sept
20,662Peak Premier in tracked matches
804Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 804
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 368 below peak (20,368)
  • +4,739 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.8%42.7%43.8%3.0% short
Shot accuracy13.0%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.991.020.03 short
Match win rate40.9%43.9%44.7%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFreyjaFACEITLevel 4 · 804 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO804csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning66
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49492Last 10049%Win rateLLLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 8–13 · anubis, 19 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 3 Sept
414msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L5Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26151158%0.01
ancientC2181338%-0.02
anubisC1771041%-0.00
mirageC125742%-0.01
nukeB105550%-0.00
infernoS96367%0.01
cache43175%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,695Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
5,461Matches
40.9%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12,279MVPs
2,316Hours (in match)
6,245Bombs planted
1,372Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,909
AWP19,131
Tec-93,208
P902,951
P2502,170

Lifetime map wins

20,374dust2
7,616nuke
5,440inferno
882vertigo
748train
250cbble
113office
48dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

441Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28853%1.0616.1
Mirage5744%1.1315.4
Inferno5452%0.9415.0
Anubis4943%0.9013.5
Vertigo2454%0.9914.4
Ancient2245%1.0616.8
Nuke2250%0.8112.8
Train450%1.0010.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
552msReaction time
65.7%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.33HE damage / grenade
16.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.4394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.1117%21 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0118%20 Sept
vertigo4–130.0220%19 Sept
anubis8–130.1015%19 Sept
ancient7–130.0520%19 Sept
anubis13–60.0428%19 Sept
anubis5–13-0.068%16 Sept
dust213–20.0322%16 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0116%16 Sept
anubis13–90.0432%16 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0016%14 Sept
dust213–50.0324%14 Sept
anubis13–70.0225%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0312%14 Sept
dust213–70.0334%14 Sept
dust213–50.0430%14 Sept
mirage13–40.0721%14 Sept
inferno13–30.0620%14 Sept
mirage2–130.0636%13 Sept
anubis10–13-0.029%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0527%12 Sept
anubis13–110.0123%12 Sept
ancient13–80.0722%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0312%11 Sept
dust216–140.0117%11 Sept
anubis11–13-0.078%11 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0315%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0119%11 Sept
dust210–130.0322%11 Sept
ancient6–130.0125%10 Sept
dust26–13-0.0023%10 Sept
ancient13–100.0320%10 Sept
cache16–12-0.0710%10 Sept
dust210–130.0017%10 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0027%5 Sept
dust213–10.018%5 Sept
cache5–13-0.1012%5 Sept
nuke13–90.0818%4 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0233%4 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0416%4 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0218%4 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0336%3 Sept
cache13–10-0.0410%3 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0019%3 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0210%3 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0826%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.058%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0118%2 Sept
dust213–90.0220%2 Sept
ancient13–50.0219%2 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0314%2 Sept
nuke13–60.0115%2 Sept
anubis13–50.0511%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0814%1 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0321%1 Sept
inferno13–10.0127%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0514%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0113%31 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0119%31 Aug
inferno13–40.037%31 Aug
dust216–12-0.0017%31 Aug
dust213–30.0621%31 Aug
dust215–15-0.0325%31 Aug
anubis13–40.0122%31 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0614%31 Aug
inferno13–160.0624%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0422%29 Aug
nuke13–80.0124%29 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0121%29 Aug
dust213–120.0835%29 Aug
dust213–70.0631%29 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0116%29 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0213%29 Aug
cache13–30.0711%29 Aug
nuke6–30.0923%29 Aug
anubis10–130.0413%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0016%28 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0117%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0135%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.0121%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0235%27 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0421%27 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0417%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0524%27 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0710%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0113%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0522%26 Aug
ancient13–16-0.117%26 Aug
nuke10–130.0112%26 Aug
ancient13–40.0233%26 Aug
dust25–9-0.0522%26 Aug
dust213–40.0321%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0119%25 Aug
dust213–16-0.0224%25 Aug
mirage13–10.0220%25 Aug
dust213–16-0.0011%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.0415%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.009%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.009%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1219%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →