Z1

Z1 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198074101585[U:1:113835857]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,860Tracked matches58%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (48 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,860 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,649 +545 17 Jan – 5 Apr · 7 days played
24,82825,959peak 25,95917 Jan5 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,914 +0 9 Sept – 15 Sept · 3 observations
1,9141,914peak 1,9149 Sept15 Sept
25,959Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,914Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-01-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZ1PEAK ELO1,914csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning56
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–40–5Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWWTTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +120ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.6
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time584ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 11 Apr →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 10 May →
422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 26 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2615–1158%0.01
dust2A169–756%-0.02
mirageB147–750%-0.03
infernoA149–564%0.02
overpassA85–363%0.00
ancientC73–443%-0.00
anubisA74–357%0.01
nukeC73–443%0.00
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,694Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
69.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22549%0.8812.8
Ancient13050%0.9113.2
Inferno12854%0.9713.8
Vertigo12155%1.0115.0
Anubis11350%0.9514.0
Dust29943%0.8011.7
Nuke4657%0.9714.0
Overpass3749%0.8812.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
587msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
11.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7344% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0318%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0427%28 Jul →
cache11–130.0711%6 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0215%5 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0515%2 Jul →
cache13–70.0916%2 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0016%2 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0717%2 Jul →
cache13–80.0923%29 Jun →
inferno13–80.0317%29 Jun →
cache7–130.0825%28 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0113%26 Jun →
inferno9–130.0023%26 Jun →
ancient13–110.0527%26 Jun →
vertigo14–160.0424%26 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0326%16 Jun →
inferno3–130.0138%8 Jun →
cache12–120.0618%6 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0418%6 Jun →
cache13–50.0116%31 May →
cache13–70.0226%31 May →
cache13–60.0122%27 May →
cache13–7-0.0213%17 May →
cache13–80.0944%10 May →
cache13–100.0131%10 May →
cache12–12-0.0518%10 May →
cache13–7-0.0626%3 May →
cache8–20.0142%3 May →
cache11–13-0.0231%2 May →
cache13–5-0.0328%2 May →
cache13–110.0527%2 May →
cache12–12-0.0137%1 May →
cache13–6-0.0119%1 May →
cache11–13-0.0329%1 May →
cache6–13-0.0332%1 May →
inferno7–13-0.0120%19 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0128%18 Apr →
inferno8–130.0419%12 Apr →
inferno13–100.1522%11 Apr →
inferno13–110.0533%6 Apr →
inferno10–30.0224%5 Apr →
inferno13–90.0227%5 Apr →
inferno13–6-0.0128%3 Apr →
nuke13–50.0532%3 Apr →
nuke3–130.0620%29 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0122%29 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0315%23 Mar →
overpass13–9-0.0235%9 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0118%8 Mar →
overpass13–60.0430%8 Mar →
mirage13–70.0223%8 Mar →
ancient14–16-0.0318%8 Mar →
dust222–20-0.0122%8 Mar →
nuke16–140.0122%8 Mar →
overpass13–60.1023%8 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0032%8 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0130%7 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0230%3 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.0119%28 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0217%27 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0521%27 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0412%27 Feb →
overpass13–40.0235%27 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0213%22 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0718%21 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0128%21 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0724%21 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0310%21 Feb →
dust213–7-0.0220%20 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.107%20 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0024%20 Feb →
dust213–10.0925%20 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0533%20 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0617%19 Feb →
dust213–90.0131%17 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0323%17 Feb →
overpass13–90.0021%17 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0214%16 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0419%29 Jan →
dust213–110.0215%29 Jan →
overpass5–13-0.025%29 Jan →
dust213–16-0.0513%27 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0223%27 Jan →
anubis13–60.0023%26 Jan →
nuke13–90.0211%26 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0926%26 Jan →
mirage13–30.0732%25 Jan →
dust24–13-0.0925%25 Jan →
anubis13–60.0310%25 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0133%25 Jan →
mirage13–4-0.0610%25 Jan →
ancient13–100.0122%25 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0126%23 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0322%23 Jan →
anubis13–10-0.0117%22 Jan →
anubis13–40.1022%22 Jan →
inferno13–80.0516%17 Jan →
dust213–100.0228%17 Jan →
dust214–16-0.0511%17 Jan →
ancient9–130.0422%17 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.