Juranovic — CS2 Stats
76561198072235021[U:1:111969293]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 42.8% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 16.5% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 49.8% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Effective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.
Areas to improve
Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 26 | 17–9 | 65% | 0.02 | |
| S | 18 | 14–4 | 78% | 0.02 | |
| C | 14 | 6–8 | 43% | 0.00 | |
| C | 12 | 5–7 | 42% | -0.00 | |
| C | 12 | 5–7 | 42% | 0.01 | |
| D | 11 | 3–8 | 27% | -0.01 | |
| B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | -0.03 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.08 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 40 | 48% | 0.93 | 13.9 |
| Ancient | 32 | 59% | 1.24 | 17.3 |
| Anubis | 31 | 45% | 0.94 | 14.2 |
| Vertigo | 30 | 53% | 1.02 | 15.7 |
| Dust2 | 12 | 42% | 0.88 | 13.9 |
| Overpass | 5 | 40% | 0.83 | 13.0 |
| Nuke | 2 | 50% | 0.78 | 11.0 |
| Inferno | 1 | 100% | 0.65 | 13.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.0589% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4–13 | -0.08 | 36% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 36% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 18% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 12% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 22% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.16 | 15% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 12 Mar → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.08 | 3% | 4 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 9% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 17% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 14% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 33% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 16% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 7% | 17 Feb → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.05 | 24% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 14% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 12% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 25% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.05 | 17% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 38% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 19% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.06 | 27% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 16% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 36% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 2–10 | -0.02 | 12% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.00 | 20% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 28% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 13% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.03 | 13% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.04 | 16% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.03 | 26% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 18% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 9% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 19% | 9 Feb → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.01 | 18% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.05 | 27% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.00 | 14% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 16% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.01 | 13% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 27% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 13% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 10% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 13% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 19% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.15 | 17% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 21% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 25% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 1–6 | -0.01 | 9% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.03 | 22% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 11–3 | 0.00 | 40% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 3 Feb → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 1 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 1 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 36% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.06 | 22% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.03 | 13% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.00 | 22% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 16% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 7% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.13 | 19% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 26% | 30 Jan → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.07 | 15% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 15% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.02 | 24% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 12% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 12% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 25% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 13% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.09 | 20% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 21% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 28% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 24% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.00 | 15% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 12% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 15% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.00 | 18% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 18% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.00 | 22% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 21% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.03 | 17% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 32% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 10% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 29% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 21% | 22 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.