B. MonKe — CS2 Stats

76561198070152205[U:1:109886477]

1,960Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,896Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2829 of 17423 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

24,896Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,896
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 104 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning52

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4

Aggression6.1

Utility6.3

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.2

Utility6.3

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time528ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms

Headshot accuracy20.0%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — anubis 13–7

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

L3Current streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	26	18–8	69%	0.02
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.01
dust2	D	15	4–11	27%	-0.02
anubis	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
inferno	S	14	10–4	71%	0.02
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.03
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

591Matches

52%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

80.1ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	72	60%	1.12	17.1
Anubis	63	60%	1.24	17.5
Ancient	46	61%	1.15	17.3
Dust2	30	47%	1.05	16.8
Vertigo	26	62%	1.08	17.1
Nuke	18	44%	1.06	16.2
Inferno	18	44%	1.02	17.3
Overpass	10	40%	1.10	17.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

79.1%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

527msReaction time

26.9%T opening success

45.0%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

11.38HE damage / grenade

7.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.9253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	4–9	0.06	9%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	11%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	21%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	26%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	22%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	45%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	36%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	17%	13 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	21%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.00	13%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	32%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	17%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	32%	12 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	9%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	9%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	29%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	11%	11 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.12	18%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	22%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	20%	10 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	32%	10 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	8%	10 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.00	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	32%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.04	19%	9 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	22%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.08	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	17%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	20%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.12	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	24%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	20%	6 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	26%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	5 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.06	25%	5 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	18%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	29%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.04	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	12%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	24%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	26%	4 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	14%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	8%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	33%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	25%	1 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	24%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	26%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	33%	31 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.06	23%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	26%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	18%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	7%	30 Jul →
anubis	22–20	-0.03	26%	29 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.10	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	25%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.19	35%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.00	16%	25 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.03	17%	24 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	8%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.06	17%	18 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	18%	18 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.00	21%	18 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	8%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.10	22%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	26%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	28%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	35%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.04	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	15 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.11	14%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	10%	15 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.03	18%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.06	4%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	17%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.12	15%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.13	26%	15 Jul →