Tamara Romanova

Tamara Romanova — CS2 Stats

RU76561198069389463[U:1:109123735]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,235Tracked matches61%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 15 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +1,129 17 Jun16 Sept · 21 days played
11,19014,999peak 14,99917 Jun16 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-06-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,999
  • +1,568 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,585 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTamara RomanovaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning42
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateTWWTWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 302 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 1352 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time615ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 30 Aug
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 4 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 17 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 16 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB22101245%-0.00
infernoA2213959%-0.01
cacheA1811761%-0.00
anubisD1631319%-0.04
mirageC73443%-0.01
dust2A53260%-0.01
nukeD51420%-0.03
poseidon1010%-0.01
boulder1010%-0.09
shelter1010%-0.04
fachwerk1010%0.00
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
54%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
622msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
5.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4365 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3075% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–15-0.0224%16 Sept
mirage13–60.0333%16 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0211%16 Sept
poseidon8–8-0.0138%16 Sept
inferno13–30.0322%14 Sept
cache13–40.0423%14 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0525%13 Sept
ancient13–70.017%13 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0413%13 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0511%13 Sept
inferno13–40.0211%6 Sept
cache13–100.0411%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0316%6 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0517%5 Sept
inferno13–20.1321%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0215%5 Sept
ancient16–130.0220%4 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0313%4 Sept
inferno13–30.0116%4 Sept
ancient13–90.0318%4 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0113%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0314%3 Sept
cache13–30.188%30 Aug
cache9–13-0.0216%30 Aug
inferno13–100.0318%30 Aug
cache10–13-0.0320%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0612%27 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0512%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.008%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0225%26 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0017%26 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0811%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%25 Aug
ancient13–50.0123%25 Aug
ancient10–13-0.029%19 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0811%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0113%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0611%15 Aug
cache13–5-0.028%15 Aug
anubis4–13-0.129%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0717%15 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0223%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0323%14 Aug
ancient13–50.0230%14 Aug
inferno13–50.0215%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.048%14 Aug
cache13–60.0313%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.038%11 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0119%11 Aug
cache11–13-0.0810%10 Aug
ancient13–30.0120%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0219%10 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0112%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.047%8 Aug
inferno9–130.0029%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0320%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0217%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.0421%5 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0814%5 Aug
ancient13–40.0720%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0612%4 Aug
cache13–11-0.0514%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0741%4 Aug
ancient13–50.1416%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0819%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0516%1 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0714%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0217%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.054%31 Jul
cache13–11-0.0213%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0410%31 Jul
cache16–130.0419%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0218%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.019%31 Jul
boulder11–13-0.0915%28 Jul
cache13–10-0.0422%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0221%28 Jul
cache13–10-0.0622%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0725%28 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0417%22 Jul
fachwerk7–130.0027%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0131%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0512%16 Jul
dust213–10.1418%16 Jul
inferno8–130.0528%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.049%2 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0110%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0717%2 Jul
overpass15–15-0.0215%2 Jul
dust216–14-0.0327%2 Jul
inferno1–13-0.069%18 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0820%18 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0416%18 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0611%18 Jun
mirage13–40.0117%17 Jun
cache13–30.0521%17 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0523%17 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0420%17 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1121%17 Jun
mirage8–13-0.048%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →