Awsome

Awsome — CS2 Stats

76561198069145054[U:1:108879326]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,207Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,493Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56102 of 224517 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 5,207 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 21 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,493 -4,435 21 Jun1 Sept · 27 days played
20,54227,283peak 27,28321 Jun1 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,302 +0 28 Aug1 Sept · 2 observations
2,3022,302peak 2,30228 Aug1 Sept
27,560Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,302Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,302
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 198 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,790 below peak (27,283)
  • -242 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,507 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAwsomePREMIER21,493 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,302csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning58
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility7.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.8
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time528ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 23 Jul
43%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 11 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · debris, 11 Jul
13–4Biggest win · ancient, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
816In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7infernoWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB1991047%0.02
infernoC1881044%0.01
nukeB179853%0.03
ancientB147750%0.02
mirageB137654%0.01
anubisA74357%0.04
dust2A74357%0.01
poseidon21150%-0.04
debris2020%-0.16
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,997Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
79.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31248%1.0816.3
Ancient30752%1.0815.9
Anubis24451%1.0515.3
Nuke23758%1.1016.1
Dust26638%1.0415.3
Overpass6148%1.0314.8
Inferno4947%1.1015.7
Vertigo1338%1.1017.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
534msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
10.32HE damage / grenade
19.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5228° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0819%1 Sept
ancient13–40.089%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0020%31 Aug
cache22–190.0624%31 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0323%31 Aug
nuke13–100.0035%20 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0016%12 Aug
anubis13–110.0221%10 Aug
nuke9–13-0.039%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0014%10 Aug
cache4–13-0.0838%10 Aug
mirage10–20.0529%10 Aug
dust215–15-0.0012%10 Aug
dust216–140.0328%6 Aug
anubis9–130.0720%6 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0118%6 Aug
ancient13–80.0718%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0124%4 Aug
cache8–13-0.0623%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.059%3 Aug
cache13–100.0324%30 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0436%30 Jul
anubis4–00.0636%30 Jul
nuke16–120.0420%29 Jul
inferno9–130.0315%29 Jul
nuke9–60.0918%29 Jul
nuke11–130.0314%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0812%28 Jul
ancient5–130.0322%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0119%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0117%26 Jul
cache13–40.0821%26 Jul
anubis11–130.0016%25 Jul
anubis13–40.0723%25 Jul
cache0–40.0125%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0223%25 Jul
cache13–50.0118%25 Jul
inferno8–30.0025%25 Jul
cache11–13-0.0315%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.0834%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0722%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0317%23 Jul
inferno13–60.2116%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0529%23 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0323%22 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0327%22 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0316%22 Jul
nuke8–130.0126%21 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0213%21 Jul
cache11–130.0819%21 Jul
mirage13–80.028%21 Jul
cache13–4-0.0129%20 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0319%20 Jul
dust213–80.0228%20 Jul
ancient10–130.0722%20 Jul
cache9–13-0.0035%20 Jul
nuke9–40.0517%19 Jul
anubis13–40.0526%18 Jul
dust212–160.0620%18 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0423%18 Jul
cache16–14-0.0221%18 Jul
inferno8–8-0.1413%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0317%17 Jul
dust216–130.0122%15 Jul
cache13–100.0324%15 Jul
inferno12–160.0322%15 Jul
inferno13–50.1219%14 Jul
mirage13–60.1524%14 Jul
cache9–130.0316%14 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0028%14 Jul
cache8–130.0323%13 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0021%13 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.0126%11 Jul
debris2–9-0.2520%11 Jul
debris8–8-0.0714%11 Jul
nuke9–50.1130%11 Jul
inferno9–50.0936%11 Jul
inferno11–130.0143%11 Jul
dust213–50.0316%11 Jul
cache13–110.0116%11 Jul
cache8–130.0829%11 Jul
mirage14–160.0320%6 Jul
nuke13–70.0913%6 Jul
ancient13–60.0211%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0515%5 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0514%5 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0019%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0727%4 Jul
nuke7–90.0111%4 Jul
nuke8–80.1727%4 Jul
poseidon9–7-0.0627%4 Jul
inferno9–50.0518%4 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0111%1 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0813%1 Jul
nuke13–160.0119%1 Jul
inferno5–90.0021%28 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0418%28 Jun
ancient13–60.0421%28 Jun
ancient15–150.1020%21 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0316%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →