LeKingPin

LeKingPin — CS2 Stats

CA76561198069056158[U:1:108790430]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,680Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,499Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8572 of 221826 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,455 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,499 +2,533 16 Aug15 Sept · 28 days played
23,96627,265peak 27,26516 Aug15 Sept
27,318Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,455Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,455
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 76 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 766 below peak (27,265)
  • +2,533 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,501 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeKingPinFACEITLevel 7 · 1,455 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,499 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,455csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning69
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53407Last 10053%Win rateWLTWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 884 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.7
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.9
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact5.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time512ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 16 Aug
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 29 Aug
328msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 30 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26151158%0.04
infernoB189950%0.03
ancientA169756%0.04
cacheA1610663%0.04
anubisA95456%0.05
mirageC83538%0.03
nukeD72529%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

957Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno12156%1.1015.3
Dust210653%1.0415.3
Mirage8542%0.8812.6
Ancient7938%0.9614.7
Anubis5947%0.9713.5
Train1540%0.9815.0
Nuke1547%0.8014.1
Overpass1050%1.0014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
509msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
15.26HE damage / grenade
11.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7881% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0119%15 Sept
ancient12–160.0115%15 Sept
dust215–150.1225%14 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0033%14 Sept
ancient13–80.0323%13 Sept
inferno13–100.1224%13 Sept
anubis13–40.0019%13 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0122%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0430%11 Sept
dust24–130.0739%11 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0125%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0415%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0314%9 Sept
ancient8–130.1016%9 Sept
nuke15–150.0425%9 Sept
cache8–130.0435%9 Sept
inferno15–150.0621%8 Sept
dust215–150.0223%8 Sept
mirage13–60.1222%8 Sept
dust213–70.0123%7 Sept
nuke5–00.0722%7 Sept
dust25–130.0433%7 Sept
ancient13–40.0120%7 Sept
inferno13–80.0722%7 Sept
cache5–13-0.0122%6 Sept
inferno12–160.0224%6 Sept
inferno6–130.0828%5 Sept
anubis16–140.1318%5 Sept
ancient15–150.0530%5 Sept
dust213–100.1121%5 Sept
inferno12–160.0428%4 Sept
nuke13–100.0222%4 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0026%4 Sept
cache13–110.0720%3 Sept
ancient16–140.0218%3 Sept
cache11–130.0122%3 Sept
anubis8–130.0426%3 Sept
anubis16–140.0319%2 Sept
ancient12–160.0123%2 Sept
dust213–100.0819%2 Sept
cache11–13-0.0221%1 Sept
ancient13–60.1523%1 Sept
dust29–130.0228%31 Aug
inferno13–90.0120%31 Aug
dust216–140.0527%31 Aug
ancient10–130.0215%31 Aug
cache5–20.0515%30 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0125%30 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0229%29 Aug
cache13–80.0421%29 Aug
dust213–70.0721%29 Aug
ancient13–70.0123%29 Aug
dust213–70.0252%29 Aug
cache11–130.0027%28 Aug
dust213–70.0521%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0814%28 Aug
inferno0–13-0.1011%28 Aug
dust213–16-0.0123%27 Aug
anubis15–150.1017%27 Aug
cache13–20.0117%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0214%25 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0418%25 Aug
cache13–90.1418%25 Aug
mirage14–160.0317%25 Aug
dust214–160.0419%24 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0126%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0619%24 Aug
dust213–90.0117%24 Aug
mirage13–80.1019%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0024%23 Aug
inferno13–50.0924%23 Aug
dust213–80.0428%21 Aug
inferno13–80.1025%21 Aug
inferno11–130.0322%21 Aug
mirage15–150.0117%20 Aug
ancient10–130.0916%20 Aug
dust28–130.1127%20 Aug
cache13–60.0425%20 Aug
ancient8–130.0327%20 Aug
nuke7–130.0222%20 Aug
cache5–13-0.0022%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0728%19 Aug
dust213–9-0.0015%19 Aug
anubis5–130.0325%18 Aug
dust213–90.0820%18 Aug
nuke11–130.0428%18 Aug
cache13–90.1128%18 Aug
inferno13–80.0140%18 Aug
anubis13–50.0421%17 Aug
dust213–50.0519%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0926%17 Aug
cache13–110.0517%17 Aug
dust213–10.1730%16 Aug
cache13–40.1025%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0217%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0121%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0310%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0510%16 Aug
cache13–110.0829%16 Aug
dust213–60.0730%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →