omniguy69 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198068462563[U:1:108196835]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,281Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#38570 of 47080 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,012 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,012Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,012
Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 488 to go
Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning58

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–35–3Last 10062%Win rateWWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression5.6

Utility7.1

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.8

Utility7.1

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time524ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — sanctum 9–2

13–1Biggest win — anubis

9Longest win streak

W3Current streak

13–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	29	19–10	66%	0.03
mirage	A	20	11–9	55%	0.05
ancient	S	15	11–4	73%	0.03
cache	S	11	8–3	73%	0.01
dust2	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.09
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
sanctum	—	2	2–0	100%	0.18
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.13
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.17
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,906Matches

52%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

83.0ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	507	52%	1.11	15.4
Nuke	486	56%	1.20	16.7
Ancient	483	59%	1.13	16.0
Dust2	201	44%	1.01	14.6
Train	122	53%	1.11	16.2
Overpass	107	59%	1.10	15.3
Anubis	80	41%	1.22	15.3
Vertigo	51	55%	1.12	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

511msReaction time

28.7%T opening success

56.3%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

8.85HE damage / grenade

9.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7261% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	25–23	0.03	29%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	36%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.05	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	25%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	17%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	31%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
fachwerk	13–2	0.17	22%	17 Aug →
boulder	7–13	0.07	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	35%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	18%	10 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	25%	9 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	20%	9 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	29%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	19%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.09	31%	7 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	26%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	14%	16 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.01	21%	16 Jul →
ancient	19–17	-0.01	18%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.08	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.04	19%	15 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.02	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	28%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	18%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	26%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	27%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	34%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.04	36%	12 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	36%	5 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	23%	5 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.06	16%	4 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	19%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.03	33%	10 Jun →
ancient	16–12	0.03	16%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.00	20%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.05	12%	8 Jun →
vertigo	0–7	-0.05	0%	8 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.23	10%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.02	15%	4 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.01	20%	4 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.00	18%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.04	31%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	21%	31 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	27%	19 May →
mirage	15–15	0.04	20%	19 May →
ancient	3–13	0.02	24%	19 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	17%	19 May →
nuke	13–7	0.11	28%	19 May →
nuke	0–3	-0.01	100%	17 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	23%	17 May →
ancient	7–0	0.03	14%	17 May →
nuke	16–14	0.08	23%	14 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	26%	13 May →
inferno	9–1	0.27	19%	12 May →
sanctum	9–2	0.30	17%	11 May →
poseidon	9–2	0.14	24%	11 May →
mirage	12–12	0.07	23%	11 May →
cache	13–8	0.06	25%	10 May →
cache	13–8	0.10	23%	10 May →
nuke	22–19	-0.00	16%	3 May →
dust2	13–9	0.09	29%	3 May →
cache	13–8	0.07	31%	29 Apr →
nuke	9–3	0.24	21%	28 Apr →
poseidon	9–7	0.12	29%	28 Apr →
sanctum	9–7	0.06	31%	28 Apr →
mirage	19–17	0.02	13%	26 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	18%	26 Apr →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	22%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.08	27%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.03	26%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.07	19%	19 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.08	18%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.07	22%	12 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.05	18%	12 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	40%	11 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	22%	11 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	32%	11 Apr →
overpass	10–13	-0.00	12%	10 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.09	23%	9 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.06	21%	9 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.05	27%	29 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	20%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.04	24%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.09	44%	27 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.17	25%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.05	29%	21 Mar →
dust2	9–13	0.02	35%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–2	0.19	31%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–3	0.10	29%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.05	19%	12 Mar →
inferno	11–13	0.01	29%	10 Mar →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	21%	10 Mar →
ancient	7–13	0.11	25%	10 Mar →
nuke	6–13	0.04	28%	10 Mar →