Subarashii

Subarashii — CS2 Stats

US76561198066983877[U:1:106718149]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

712Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+45Tracked matches · now 712
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 30 Jan 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

50Days played since 2024-01-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSubarashiiFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning45
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.5
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time537ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−7.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 11–13 · train, 16 Aug
45%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · anubis, 23 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 22 Feb
13–1Biggest win · train, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1012In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC27111641%0.03
mirageS2718967%0.02
ancientA159660%0.01
dust2A85363%0.01
vertigoA74357%0.02
infernoS65183%0.00
trainA53260%0.07
cache32167%0.03
nuke1010%-0.03
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,279Matches
55%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
77.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8855%1.1215.5
Ancient4957%1.1015.9
Dust24969%1.2215.0
Anubis4641%1.1116.2
Inferno3355%1.1416.1
Cache1479%1.0214.9
Vertigo1331%1.1716.1
Nuke944%1.0015.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
525msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
15.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.311% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–70.0918%16 Sept
dust24–13-0.0714%15 Sept
ancient13–110.0320%14 Sept
cache13–100.0322%9 Sept
ancient13–100.0019%8 Sept
inferno4–1-0.0118%7 Sept
anubis7–130.0518%4 Sept
mirage7–130.0118%30 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0321%30 Aug
dust213–80.0221%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0124%26 Aug
mirage13–20.0321%26 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0224%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0225%24 Aug
dust213–70.039%24 Aug
anubis16–190.0020%20 Aug
mirage13–50.1121%20 Aug
ancient19–170.0116%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0324%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0218%19 Aug
dust214–16-0.0423%19 Aug
dust210–130.0221%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0220%18 Aug
train13–10.0216%16 Aug
train11–130.1719%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0112%13 Aug
ancient8–130.1016%10 Aug
anubis11–130.0013%8 Aug
cache13–10-0.0024%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0338%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0333%6 Aug
mirage20–220.0627%3 Aug
mirage13–20.0639%1 Aug
cache11–130.0616%26 Jul
anubis13–100.0232%26 Jul
dust213–70.0128%25 Jul
anubis13–50.1119%24 Jul
mirage13–100.0226%24 Jul
anubis13–20.0837%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0729%23 Jul
anubis8–130.1545%23 Jul
anubis13–90.1531%23 Jul
train13–110.1328%25 Apr
train13–20.0336%25 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0321%1 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0617%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0522%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0635%29 Jun
dust213–40.0720%28 Jun
dust213–60.0732%25 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0319%25 Jun
train14–16-0.0331%25 Jun
inferno13–60.0732%25 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0127%23 Feb
anubis2–130.0123%22 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0322%22 Feb
ancient13–30.0123%21 Feb
anubis6–130.0127%21 Feb
anubis14–160.0927%21 Feb
anubis13–70.0530%20 Feb
vertigo13–16-0.0125%19 Feb
mirage13–80.0127%19 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0212%19 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0217%16 Feb
anubis15–190.0125%16 Feb
mirage13–90.0628%14 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0217%14 Feb
mirage17–190.0230%12 Feb
mirage13–10.0329%11 Feb
overpass13–110.0325%11 Feb
vertigo3–13-0.0930%11 Feb
vertigo13–80.0637%11 Feb
anubis8–130.0325%10 Feb
vertigo13–50.1228%10 Feb
mirage10–130.0324%10 Feb
anubis11–130.0824%8 Feb
anubis13–70.0842%8 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0131%8 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0219%8 Feb
mirage13–40.0325%8 Feb
inferno13–100.0331%7 Feb
anubis13–80.0026%6 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0321%6 Feb
vertigo13–6-0.0231%6 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0128%6 Feb
ancient13–30.0228%4 Feb
vertigo13–80.0731%4 Feb
mirage13–110.0223%4 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0524%4 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0530%4 Feb
ancient11–130.0133%2 Feb
anubis3–13-0.1340%2 Feb
mirage10–130.0224%2 Feb
mirage13–100.0837%2 Feb
ancient6–13-0.069%1 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0229%1 Feb
anubis10–130.0414%1 Feb
mirage13–80.0134%31 Jan
mirage13–110.0429%30 Jan
mirage13–90.0544%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →