yerf

yerf — CS2 Stats

76561198066576048[U:1:106310320]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,325Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,987 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,987 → 1,987
+10Tracked matches · now 1,325
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,987 +0 28 Aug – 18 Oct · 4 observations
1,9871,987peak 1,98728 Aug18 Oct
1,987Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,987
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 14 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGyerfFACEITLevel 10 · 1,987 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,987csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning60
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–54Last 10046%Win rateWLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility7.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.0
Utility7.3
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time505ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 24 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 1 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 22 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 37% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3011–1937%0.01
dust2A2514–1156%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.01
anubisB115–645%-0.00
cacheA106–460%0.04
nuke—42–250%-0.01
inferno—31–233%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 30). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

459Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15050%1.1816.4
Ancient9760%1.2116.6
Dust28457%1.1516.4
Anubis4238%1.1115.2
Cache2458%1.1516.6
Inferno1741%1.0014.3
Nuke1354%1.2614.5
Overpass560%1.4619.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
495msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
13.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8453% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0216%30 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0118%30 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0716%30 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0312%29 Oct →
dust213–90.0920%29 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0612%29 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0217%29 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0215%29 Oct →
cache13–90.0316%28 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0121%28 Oct →
ancient7–130.0118%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0618%29 Sept →
mirage13–70.0625%29 Sept →
cache13–60.0319%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0518%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0521%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0324%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0216%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0915%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0417%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0225%25 Sept →
dust213–90.1023%24 Sept →
ancient13–50.0512%24 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0231%24 Sept →
cache13–20.1433%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0321%24 Sept →
dust26–130.0326%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0422%22 Sept →
ancient6–130.0521%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.0223%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0217%19 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0123%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.1013%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.045%19 Sept →
dust213–70.0516%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0417%18 Sept →
dust216–140.0216%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0120%18 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0418%15 Sept →
mirage4–130.0318%11 Sept →
dust213–100.0117%11 Sept →
ancient13–80.0210%11 Sept →
inferno9–130.0218%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0619%10 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0215%10 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0315%10 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.044%9 Sept →
dust28–130.0216%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0427%9 Sept →
dust216–140.0120%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0214%8 Sept →
cache11–130.0119%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0416%7 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0222%7 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0718%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.007%7 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0029%6 Sept →
nuke13–20.1011%5 Sept →
ancient14–160.0311%5 Sept →
mirage17–190.0415%5 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0314%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0815%4 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0711%4 Sept →
cache13–80.1116%4 Sept →
cache13–70.1222%4 Sept →
mirage17–19-0.0417%3 Sept →
anubis13–80.049%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0216%3 Sept →
dust213–40.0633%3 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0135%1 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0211%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0016%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0114%30 Aug →
dust213–8-0.045%30 Aug →
dust213–110.0326%29 Aug →
vertigo10–13-0.0413%29 Aug →
mirage7–130.0714%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0115%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0621%29 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0714%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0115%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0510%28 Aug →
mirage13–30.0816%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0114%27 Aug →
mirage14–160.0310%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0226%26 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0013%26 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0513%26 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0012%24 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0118%22 Aug →
anubis8–130.0210%22 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0423%21 Aug →
anubis13–30.0119%21 Aug →
anubis13–70.0718%21 Aug →
inferno13–50.0115%21 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0318%21 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0226%21 Aug →
dust28–130.0622%21 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.