Johnywaffel — CS2 Stats

76561198066324440[U:1:106058712]✓ No bans

881Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJohnywaffelFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning42
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49492Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression2.3
Utility5.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time524ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — cache
9Longest win streak
312In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 66% over 32dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS32211166%-0.00
cacheC2071335%0.00
mirageA116555%-0.01
nukeB105550%0.00
ancientC104640%-0.02
dust2D61517%-0.03
anubis42250%0.01
train42250%-0.01
boulder21150%-0.01
office1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,270Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7757%0.9813.6
Inferno6359%0.9814.1
Anubis5046%0.9414.3
Nuke3850%0.9315.2
Mirage2952%0.9413.8
Dust22454%0.8512.0
Cache2133%1.5412.6
Overpass1547%0.9615.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
524msReaction time
21.6%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
10.52HE damage / grenade
5.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0821%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0133%28 Aug
inferno13–30.0431%25 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0126%23 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0315%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0322%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0429%23 Aug
inferno10–130.019%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0227%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0838%22 Aug
cache13–00.0819%22 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0116%22 Aug
cache14–16-0.0219%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0523%22 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0229%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0024%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0419%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0415%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0814%18 Aug
cache8–13-0.0616%18 Aug
train8–13-0.0721%18 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0312%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0536%17 Aug
cache12–120.1136%17 Aug
train13–30.0026%17 Aug
inferno13–60.0223%16 Aug
office11–130.0540%16 Aug
cache13–110.0317%16 Aug
cache13–100.0417%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0315%16 Aug
mirage10–50.0722%15 Aug
cache14–160.0214%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0514%14 Aug
inferno13–50.0922%14 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0631%14 Aug
mirage13–20.0529%14 Aug
inferno9–30.2328%14 Aug
train13–60.0525%14 Aug
nuke13–40.0126%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0625%13 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0514%13 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0125%13 Aug
inferno11–130.0218%13 Aug
inferno9–20.0221%13 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0316%12 Aug
train12–12-0.0117%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0118%11 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0542%11 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0129%11 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0519%9 Aug
inferno13–20.1314%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0334%9 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0418%9 Aug
inferno13–50.028%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0323%9 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0424%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.089%9 Aug
cache13–6-0.0221%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0322%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0212%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0725%7 Aug
dust22–13-0.099%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0315%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0617%6 Aug
boulder5–13-0.0824%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0619%3 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0516%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0514%2 Aug
cache10–130.0113%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0222%2 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0325%2 Aug
cache11–130.0625%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.067%1 Aug
cache3–13-0.0312%1 Aug
boulder13–20.0630%1 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0723%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0920%1 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0431%31 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0224%31 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0133%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0422%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0812%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0313%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0415%30 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0112%30 Jul
ancient16–140.0415%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0214%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0533%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0521%30 Jul
cache2–13-0.0440%29 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0115%29 Jul
inferno13–50.0017%29 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0219%29 Jul
cache12–00.1022%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0017%29 Jul
nuke19–160.0423%29 Jul
dust213–70.0025%28 Jul
cache13–70.0236%28 Jul
mirage13–0-0.017%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0416%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →