Squeezy

Squeezy — CS2 Stats

DE76561198065791544[U:1:105525816]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,377Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,356Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39578 of 259261 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,356 -4,312 5 Jul – 28 Oct · 14 days played
21,72528,079peak 28,0795 Jul28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,243 +0 10 Sept – 4 Oct · 2 observations
2,2432,243peak 2,24310 Sept4 Oct
28,079Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,243Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,243
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 257 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,723 below peak (28,079)
  • +543 over 30 days · improving
  • +694 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,644 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSqueezyPREMIER23,356 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,243csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning64
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateTLLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility6.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time542ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 6–0 · stronghold, 4 Jul →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 5 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 22mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB3114–1745%0.05
dust2A2214–864%0.02
infernoA127–558%0.03
mirageC104–640%0.05
anubisC73–443%0.05
ancientB63–350%0.01
nuke—31–233%-0.02
fachwerk—21–150%0.07
vertigo—20–20%0.02
boulder—20–20%0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.11
shelter—10–10%-0.00
stronghold—11–0100%0.33

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

681Matches
56%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
74.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26359%1.0315.4
Inferno6161%1.1716.5
Ancient5758%1.1814.9
Anubis3956%1.2515.0
Mirage1850%0.9314.5
Overpass1644%1.1015.8
Vertigo425%1.2220.0
Train250%1.1316.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.5%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
549msReaction time
44.5%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
10.80HE damage / grenade
11.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0720%28 Oct →
mirage7–130.0021%28 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0217%20 Oct →
dust29–130.0222%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0120%20 Oct →
cache13–50.0623%20 Oct →
cache13–110.0318%20 Oct →
anubis11–130.0219%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0419%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0931%10 Oct →
mirage13–40.0013%9 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0313%9 Oct →
inferno13–60.0420%9 Oct →
cache7–130.0522%2 Oct →
cache10–130.1311%30 Sept →
cache13–100.0321%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0240%28 Sept →
mirage13–00.0721%26 Sept →
nuke7–1-0.0720%26 Sept →
mirage6–130.0212%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.1431%26 Sept →
cache11–130.0323%25 Sept →
dust213–70.0118%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0421%24 Sept →
cache8–130.0516%22 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0320%22 Sept →
ancient13–20.0917%22 Sept →
anubis5–130.0448%22 Sept →
cache13–70.1115%21 Sept →
mirage12–120.1421%18 Sept →
dust27–130.0126%17 Sept →
cache13–70.0721%17 Sept →
cache13–50.1218%17 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0420%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.0121%14 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0126%14 Sept →
dust28–130.0131%2 Sept →
cache10–130.0712%2 Sept →
dust214–160.0314%2 Sept →
dust211–130.0525%9 Aug →
cache7–130.1118%9 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.068%7 Aug →
dust213–90.0921%7 Aug →
cache7–130.0352%5 Aug →
dust213–100.0310%5 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0120%5 Aug →
inferno16–130.0321%4 Aug →
cache13–110.0315%4 Aug →
dust216–120.0419%3 Aug →
cache8–130.0318%3 Aug →
inferno13–30.0228%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0219%2 Aug →
inferno13–20.0424%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0222%2 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0215%2 Aug →
cache13–1-0.0043%1 Aug →
inferno13–100.0617%1 Aug →
ancient16–130.018%1 Aug →
cache10–130.0220%28 Jul →
nuke3–130.0326%28 Jul →
overpass13–40.1119%28 Jul →
cache13–60.0723%26 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0417%26 Jul →
ancient9–130.0424%26 Jul →
dust22–13-0.078%26 Jul →
inferno8–130.0420%23 Jul →
fachwerk2–130.1224%23 Jul →
dust213–50.1117%20 Jul →
cache11–130.0026%20 Jul →
anubis13–60.0117%18 Jul →
vertigo10–130.0533%18 Jul →
cache7–30.0941%18 Jul →
boulder5–13-0.0024%17 Jul →
cache12–120.1318%17 Jul →
cache13–70.0546%16 Jul →
anubis12–120.0220%16 Jul →
ancient13–20.0223%16 Jul →
inferno12–120.0215%16 Jul →
mirage13–90.0922%16 Jul →
dust211–130.0212%16 Jul →
cache10–130.1220%16 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0514%16 Jul →
cache7–130.0729%15 Jul →
inferno5–130.0428%15 Jul →
dust213–110.0425%14 Jul →
boulder5–130.0232%13 Jul →
shelter6–13-0.0017%13 Jul →
fachwerk13–110.0224%13 Jul →
mirage13–90.0613%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0122%6 Jul →
inferno13–100.0216%5 Jul →
cache9–130.0614%4 Jul →
dust213–80.0915%4 Jul →
stronghold6–00.3327%4 Jul →
inferno13–90.1518%4 Jul →
vertigo6–13-0.0113%3 Jul →
anubis12–120.0611%3 Jul →
cache11–130.0522%3 Jul →
cache13–110.0725%30 Jun →
cache13–100.0617%30 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.