GoldenkiNNz

GoldenkiNNz — CS2 Stats

DE76561198064362167[U:1:104096439]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,536Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,952Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5243 of 15815 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,985 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGoldenkiNNzFACEITLevel 10 · 1,985 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,952 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning48
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.5
Aggression5.3
Utility6.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time503ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–0
130Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 20dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2091145%0.03
ancientA2012860%0.01
infernoA2012860%0.01
anubisB136746%0.03
nukeB105550%0.00
dust2C83538%0.01
mirage42250%0.03
overpass42250%0.00
poseidon110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

593Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8855%1.2318.2
Ancient7551%1.2317.1
Anubis7256%1.1416.4
Nuke4248%1.0715.6
Dust22756%1.1415.7
Mirage2556%0.9714.8
Vertigo1443%0.8613.0
Cache956%1.2922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
44.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
499msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.41HE damage / grenade
15.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache19–220.0024%28 Aug
nuke13–20.0323%28 Aug
nuke13–80.0415%25 Aug
anubis13–160.0133%24 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0223%24 Aug
inferno13–50.0221%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0413%23 Aug
ancient13–00.1920%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0020%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0623%22 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0621%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0726%22 Aug
inferno16–130.0417%22 Aug
ancient8–130.1123%21 Aug
mirage6–130.0516%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0114%21 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0118%21 Aug
inferno13–70.0522%21 Aug
cache13–100.0022%20 Aug
dust28–130.0323%18 Aug
dust213–50.0235%17 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0425%17 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0218%17 Aug
cache8–130.0319%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0415%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0620%15 Aug
cache11–13-0.0315%15 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0114%11 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0225%8 Aug
ancient13–100.0320%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0925%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0620%7 Aug
dust213–90.0027%7 Aug
inferno13–20.0027%7 Aug
inferno13–60.1244%6 Aug
cache13–70.0927%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0223%28 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0023%27 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0015%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0117%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0020%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0613%24 Jul
mirage13–70.0222%24 Jul
cache7–130.0025%18 Jul
nuke13–30.0221%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0132%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0419%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.0412%13 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0026%12 Jul
inferno15–150.0132%12 Jul
dust213–30.1017%12 Jul
poseidon9–20.1036%12 Jul
anubis13–9-0.017%5 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0414%20 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0312%14 Jun
anubis7–130.0138%14 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0224%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0022%9 Jun
cache13–50.0915%9 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0115%6 Jun
inferno13–100.0333%6 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0312%6 Jun
anubis13–70.0915%6 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0911%3 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0116%30 May
cache9–13-0.0224%30 May
nuke10–13-0.0218%25 May
nuke13–30.0329%25 May
inferno13–3-0.0135%25 May
inferno13–6-0.0317%25 May
anubis11–13-0.0420%23 May
overpass9–130.0522%22 May
nuke13–80.0518%17 May
inferno13–11-0.0217%17 May
cache11–130.0514%11 May
dust27–13-0.0118%11 May
cache13–70.0827%8 May
inferno15–150.0118%7 May
cache13–80.1221%6 May
cache13–40.1236%5 May
cache10–130.1118%5 May
cache3–100.0114%4 May
cache13–40.0218%3 May
cache13–40.0518%3 May
inferno3–13-0.0323%2 May
overpass7–130.0227%2 May
mirage7–20.0724%2 May
ancient13–70.0815%2 May
anubis13–80.0421%1 May
inferno5–13-0.0115%1 May
cache10–13-0.0015%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0122%30 Apr
cache13–11-0.0513%29 Apr
anubis10–130.0315%27 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0119%26 Apr
anubis13–10.1628%26 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0214%26 Apr
anubis13–110.0519%24 Apr
anubis13–110.0429%21 Apr
inferno7–13-0.1016%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →