oofk

oofk — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198064181493[U:1:103915765]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

453Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,115Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17805 of 221126 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 453 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 15 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,115 +4,698 15 May12 Sept · 19 days played
19,56625,115peak 25,11515 May12 Sept
25,115Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-05-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,115
  • +5,549 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,885 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoofkFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,115 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning65
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52462Last 10052%Win rateWWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.5
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time556ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 30 May
39%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 21 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · dust2, 15 May
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 15 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%0.00
dust2A27161159%0.03
ancientC135838%0.04
nukeS75271%0.03
anubisD71614%0.07
cacheS64267%0.03
infernoS64267%0.00
overpassA53260%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches
57%Win rate
1.54Avg K/D
92.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2157%1.3319.5
Dust21164%1.5722.3
Ancient944%1.3617.2
Anubis729%1.2421.6
Inferno560%1.0417.0
Nuke333%1.2716.3
Cache2100%0.9514.0
Overpass1100%1.3822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
550msReaction time
40.7%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.62HE damage / grenade
7.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.472 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0723%4 Sept
cache13–9-0.0326%4 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0021%2 Sept
ancient9–130.0134%2 Sept
mirage13–20.0815%2 Sept
cache13–110.1234%2 Sept
dust213–6-0.028%2 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0722%2 Sept
ancient13–60.0421%2 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0515%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0120%25 Jul
ancient15–150.1114%17 Jul
cache10–130.0123%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0224%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.0111%17 Jul
dust210–130.0628%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0113%17 Jul
inferno16–130.0115%17 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0321%16 Jul
mirage1–10-0.080%16 Jul
nuke9–130.0229%16 Jul
cache14–160.0323%15 Jul
dust213–30.0918%15 Jul
mirage13–50.0215%15 Jul
dust211–13-0.0235%10 Jul
mirage10–10.0730%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0316%10 Jul
dust213–60.0421%10 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0520%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0334%3 Jul
dust211–130.0829%3 Jul
anubis11–130.0118%3 Jul
inferno7–130.0220%2 Jul
overpass6–130.0119%28 Jun
anubis14–160.1115%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0426%28 Jun
inferno13–90.0228%28 Jun
dust210–130.0620%28 Jun
nuke13–110.0524%28 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0028%27 Jun
dust25–130.0226%20 Jun
ancient8–130.0519%20 Jun
mirage13–60.0716%19 Jun
ancient13–70.0622%19 Jun
nuke13–60.0519%19 Jun
anubis11–130.0428%19 Jun
inferno8–13-0.067%19 Jun
dust222–200.1218%18 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0326%18 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0519%18 Jun
dust213–20.1411%18 Jun
ancient13–30.1519%18 Jun
anubis11–130.0126%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0020%17 Jun
ancient16–130.0114%17 Jun
dust213–90.0118%17 Jun
dust213–160.0523%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0816%16 Jun
dust213–60.0719%16 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0712%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0421%13 Jun
anubis4–130.0325%13 Jun
dust210–130.0119%13 Jun
ancient13–110.0826%13 Jun
mirage13–60.0616%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0423%13 Jun
mirage13–80.0228%13 Jun
ancient15–150.0520%13 Jun
anubis12–160.0930%7 Jun
inferno16–130.0325%7 Jun
cache13–60.0627%6 Jun
anubis13–70.1722%30 May
mirage6–13-0.0113%28 May
mirage10–130.0323%23 May
dust213–70.0317%23 May
overpass13–9-0.0210%22 May
dust211–13-0.0115%22 May
ancient4–13-0.089%22 May
overpass6–130.0034%22 May
mirage7–130.0317%21 May
nuke5–130.0317%21 May
mirage3–13-0.0839%21 May
cache13–7-0.0118%18 May
ancient5–130.0618%18 May
dust213–90.0122%18 May
nuke13–9-0.0311%16 May
mirage13–60.0727%16 May
ancient8–130.0020%15 May
nuke13–50.0315%15 May
mirage13–70.0115%15 May
dust213–50.0227%15 May
overpass13–40.0932%15 May
dust24–13-0.0222%15 May
mirage6–13-0.0323%15 May
dust213–10.0317%15 May
mirage13–80.1216%15 May
overpass13–50.0522%15 May
dust213–90.0219%15 May
dust213–4-0.0227%15 May
dust213–10.0211%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →